2008The MIT Press eBooksRequires access

Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard: Implications for Health Insurance Markets

Mark V. Pauly

Open publisher page 29 citations

Abstract

This chapter explores two key issues in the health insurance market: adverse selection and moral hazard. It first describes ideal insurance to serve as a benchmark for comparing insurance in the presence of moral hazard and adverse selection. Given moral hazard, there is a rationale for high-deductible plans, such as the typical Health Savings Accounts, but the tax treatment of employer-provided health insurance benefits poses an impediment to the diffusion of such plans. These employee benefits are currently excluded from employees’ income for the purposes of the U.S. federal personal income tax. In contrast to moral hazard, adverse selection is a “paper tiger,” more important in theory than in practice in in health insurance. Nevertheless, adverse selection may be a significant phenomenon in other markets, depending on their specific characteristics. The chapter also considers the effects of cost sharing on health care.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter explores two key issues in the health insurance market: adverse selection and moral hazard. It first describes ideal insurance to serve as a benchmark for comparing insurance in the presence of moral hazard and adverse selection. Given moral hazard, there is a rationale for high-deductible plans, such as the typical Health Savings Accounts, but the tax treatment of employer-provided health insurance benefits poses an impediment to the diffusion of such plans. These employee benefits are currently excluded from employees’ income for the purposes of the U.S. federal personal income tax. In contrast to moral hazard, adverse selection is a “paper tiger,” more important in theory than in practice in in health insurance. Nevertheless, adverse selection may be a significant phenomenon in other markets, depending on their specific characteristics. The chapter also considers the effects of cost sharing on health care.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 29 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter explores two key issues in the health insurance market: adverse selection and moral hazard. It first describes ideal insurance to serve as a benchmark for comparing insurance in the presence of moral hazard and adverse selection. Given moral hazard, there is a rationale for high-deductible plans, such as the typical Health Savings Accounts, but the tax treatment of employer-provided health insurance benefits poses an impediment to the diffusion of such plans. These employee benefits are currently excluded from employees’ income for the purposes of the U.S. federal personal income tax. In contrast to moral hazard, adverse selection is a “paper tiger,” more important in theory than in practice in in health insurance. Nevertheless, adverse selection may be a significant phenomenon in other markets, depending on their specific characteristics. The chapter also considers the effects of cost sharing on health care.

Key concepts: Adverse selection, Moral hazard, Morale hazard, Actuarial science, Deductible, Group insurance, Casualty insurance, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard: Implications for Health Insurance Markets — Research Paper | ScholarLens