2002•Australian Journal of Social IssuesOpen access

POVERTY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY

Brian Howe, Ruth Pidwell

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

The present approach to welfare reform, as embodied in the Final Report of the Reference Croup on Welfare Reform (2000), relies heavily on the rhetoric of ‘mutual obligation’ and ‘welfare dependency’ while placing Utile emphasis on original research and relevant data that might inform and support its reform agenda. In marked contrast are the research‐driven policy processes aimed at the alleviation of child poverty that took place during the Hawke‐Keating government in the late 1980s, in this paper we illustrate the value of research in relation to two government strategies, the Family Allowance Supplement (FAS) and the Child Support Scheme (CSS), that were instrumental in bringing a significant number of children out of poverty. We suggest that any commitment to further the reduction of child poverty requires resources for ongoing research programs.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The present approach to welfare reform, as embodied in the Final Report of the Reference Croup on Welfare Reform (2000), relies heavily on the rhetoric of ‘mutual obligation’ and ‘welfare dependency’ while placing Utile emphasis on original research and relevant data that might inform and support its reform agenda. In marked contrast are the research‐driven policy processes aimed at the alleviation of child poverty that took place during the Hawke‐Keating government in the late 1980s, in this paper we illustrate the value of research in relation to two government strategies, the Family Allowance Supplement (FAS) and the Child Support Scheme (CSS), that were instrumental in bringing a significant number of children out of poverty. We suggest that any commitment to further the reduction of child poverty requires resources for ongoing research programs.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The present approach to welfare reform, as embodied in the Final Report of the Reference Croup on Welfare Reform (2000), relies heavily on the rhetoric of ‘mutual obligation’ and ‘welfare dependency’ while placing Utile emphasis on original research and relevant data that might inform and support its reform agenda. In marked contrast are the research‐driven policy processes aimed at the alleviation of child poverty that took place during the Hawke‐Keating government in the late 1980s, in this paper we illustrate the value of research in relation to two government strategies, the Family Allowance Supplement (FAS) and the Child Support Scheme (CSS), that were instrumental in bringing a significant number of children out of poverty. We suggest that any commitment to further the reduction of child poverty requires resources for ongoing research programs.

Key concepts: Welfare reform, Poverty, Welfare dependency, Project commissioning, Government (linguistics), Rhetoric, Income Support, Social policy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
POVERTY RESEARCH AND SOCIAL POLICY — Research Paper | ScholarLens