2005Unpublished venueRequires access

The Sanitary Landfill

John Pichtel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Prior to enactment of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (1976), what Americans had referred to as ‘landfills’ were typically not much more than open dumps (Figure 10.1). There was no requirement for a daily layer of soil, for example, which is important in deterring vectors and preventing other hazards or nuisance conditions. As a result, insect and rodent infestations were common at pre-RCRA facilities and there were frequent fires. These facilities were typically constructed without protective liners; therefore, contents readily leached into subsurface formations, including those which store groundwater. Many were sited at locations thought to be convenient, without regard to subsurface geology or groundwater features. There was no requirement for impermeable substrata below the landfill unit that could have prevented migration of liquids.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Prior to enactment of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (1976), what Americans had referred to as ‘landfills’ were typically not much more than open dumps (Figure 10.1). There was no requirement for a daily layer of soil, for example, which is important in deterring vectors and preventing other hazards or nuisance conditions. As a result, insect and rodent infestations were common at pre-RCRA facilities and there were frequent fires. These facilities were typically constructed without protective liners; therefore, contents readily leached into subsurface formations, including those which store groundwater. Many were sited at locations thought to be convenient, without regard to subsurface geology or groundwater features. There was no requirement for impermeable substrata below the landfill unit that could have prevented migration of liquids.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Prior to enactment of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) (1976), what Americans had referred to as ‘landfills’ were typically not much more than open dumps (Figure 10.1). There was no requirement for a daily layer of soil, for example, which is important in deterring vectors and preventing other hazards or nuisance conditions. As a result, insect and rodent infestations were common at pre-RCRA facilities and there were frequent fires. These facilities were typically constructed without protective liners; therefore, contents readily leached into subsurface formations, including those which store groundwater. Many were sited at locations thought to be convenient, without regard to subsurface geology or groundwater features. There was no requirement for impermeable substrata below the landfill unit that could have prevented migration of liquids.

Key concepts: Environmental science, Environmental planning, Waste management, Business, Water resource management, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Sanitary Landfill — Research Paper | ScholarLens