2006•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

‘Taking Notice’: An Introduction

Vasiliki Tsakiri

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The objective of this book may seem at first sight both ambitious and ambiguous since it concerns the exploration of religious themes such as the Fall, repetition and freedom through Kierkegaard’s aesthetic writings, with references to the writings of St Augustine, Kant and Schelling. The question that arises concerns not only the choice of the so-called aesthetic writings rather than the religious ones, but also the reasons behind the choice of the three other thinkers. In order to give an adequate reply to these questions, Kierkegaard’s view of his oeuvre and the distinction he draws between the aesthetic and the religious writings should be examined first. Kierkegaard’s The Point of View of My Work as an Author: A Report to History will serve as a guide in this brief exploration. Opinions are divided regarding its importance for the interpretation of his work. Arguably, even if one endorses Walter Lowrie’s argument that this book is quite elliptical as a self-evaluation of the author’s oeuvre as a whole, one might still wish to treat this feature of the book as a virtue rather than a vice. Lowrie’s embarrassment – to borrow Nelson’s expression – as to how to characterize this book is obvious in his conviction that Kierkegaard was. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The objective of this book may seem at first sight both ambitious and ambiguous since it concerns the exploration of religious themes such as the Fall, repetition and freedom through Kierkegaard’s aesthetic writings, with references to the writings of St Augustine, Kant and Schelling. The question that arises concerns not only the choice of the so-called aesthetic writings rather than the religious ones, but also the reasons behind the choice of the three other thinkers. In order to give an adequate reply to these questions, Kierkegaard’s view of his oeuvre and the distinction he draws between the aesthetic and the religious writings should be examined first. Kierkegaard’s The Point of View of My Work as an Author: A Report to History will serve as a guide in this brief exploration. Opinions are divided regarding its importance for the interpretation of his work. Arguably, even if one endorses Walter Lowrie’s argument that this book is quite elliptical as a self-evaluation of the author’s oeuvre as a whole, one might still wish to treat this feature of the book as a virtue rather than a vice. Lowrie’s embarrassment – to borrow Nelson’s expression – as to how to characterize this book is obvious in his conviction that Kierkegaard was. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The objective of this book may seem at first sight both ambitious and ambiguous since it concerns the exploration of religious themes such as the Fall, repetition and freedom through Kierkegaard’s aesthetic writings, with references to the writings of St Augustine, Kant and Schelling. The question that arises concerns not only the choice of the so-called aesthetic writings rather than the religious ones, but also the reasons behind the choice of the three other thinkers. In order to give an adequate reply to these questions, Kierkegaard’s view of his oeuvre and the distinction he draws between the aesthetic and the religious writings should be examined first. Kierkegaard’s The Point of View of My Work as an Author: A Report to History will serve as a guide in this brief exploration. Opinions are divided regarding its importance for the interpretation of his work. Arguably, even if one endorses Walter Lowrie’s argument that this book is quite elliptical as a self-evaluation of the author’s oeuvre as a whole, one might still wish to treat this feature of the book as a virtue rather than a vice. Lowrie’s embarrassment – to borrow Nelson’s expression – as to how to characterize this book is obvious in his conviction that Kierkegaard was. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Embarrassment, Wish, Interpretation (philosophy), Virtue, Philosophy, Argument (complex analysis), Notice, Conviction

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
‘Taking Notice’: An Introduction — Research Paper | ScholarLens