Accrediting Agencies Legal Responsibilities: In Pursuit of the Public Interest
William A. Kaplin
Abstract
Open-access reader
William A. Kaplin
Abstract
Open-access reader
This article considers the evolution in the way courts have labeled or categorized accrediting agencies, and the legal and policy consequences of this evolution. Discussion will then focus on the "public interest" standard that is the core of these developments and on ways in which accrediting agencies can fulfill their legal responsibilities under this standard.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article considers the evolution in the way courts have labeled or categorized accrediting agencies, and the legal and policy consequences of this evolution. Discussion will then focus on the "public interest" standard that is the core of these developments and on ways in which accrediting agencies can fulfill their legal responsibilities under this standard.
Key concepts: Public interest, Public administration, Legal responsibility, Political science, Law, Business