2013Unpublished venueRequires access

The Method of A Theory of Justice

Onora O’Neill

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

An initial way into the complexity of John Rawls's writing on method might be note that at the time of writing A Theory of Justice he was both deeply admiring and deeply critical of the Utilitarian tradition of ethical thought. The constructive method of ethical reasoning that is support an account of 'justice as fairness' is one, Rawls claims, that carries to a higher level of abstraction the familiar theory of the social contract as found, say, in Locke, Rousseau and Kant. Rawls claims initially that his fundamental method is simply too abstract, and that he generalizes and carries a higher level the traditional conception of the social contract. Rawls's notion of the 'original position' is evidently no mere abstraction, although it is abstract in many respects. The appeal reflective equilibrium entirely alters the character of Rawls's justificatory strategy. Keywords: A Theory of Justice; John Rawls; justificatory strategy; Utilitarian tradition

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An initial way into the complexity of John Rawls's writing on method might be note that at the time of writing A Theory of Justice he was both deeply admiring and deeply critical of the Utilitarian tradition of ethical thought. The constructive method of ethical reasoning that is support an account of 'justice as fairness' is one, Rawls claims, that carries to a higher level of abstraction the familiar theory of the social contract as found, say, in Locke, Rousseau and Kant. Rawls claims initially that his fundamental method is simply too abstract, and that he generalizes and carries a higher level the traditional conception of the social contract. Rawls's notion of the 'original position' is evidently no mere abstraction, although it is abstract in many respects. The appeal reflective equilibrium entirely alters the character of Rawls's justificatory strategy. Keywords: A Theory of Justice; John Rawls; justificatory strategy; Utilitarian tradition

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An initial way into the complexity of John Rawls's writing on method might be note that at the time of writing A Theory of Justice he was both deeply admiring and deeply critical of the Utilitarian tradition of ethical thought. The constructive method of ethical reasoning that is support an account of 'justice as fairness' is one, Rawls claims, that carries to a higher level of abstraction the familiar theory of the social contract as found, say, in Locke, Rousseau and Kant. Rawls claims initially that his fundamental method is simply too abstract, and that he generalizes and carries a higher level the traditional conception of the social contract. Rawls's notion of the 'original position' is evidently no mere abstraction, although it is abstract in many respects. The appeal reflective equilibrium entirely alters the character of Rawls's justificatory strategy. Keywords: A Theory of Justice; John Rawls; justificatory strategy; Utilitarian tradition

Key concepts: Original position, Reflective equilibrium, Economic Justice, Epistemology, Appeal, Constructive, Abstraction, Social contract

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Method of A Theory of Justice — Research Paper | ScholarLens