2015•Policy Press eBooksRequires access

Participatory action research and policy change

Brett G. Stoudt, María Elena Torre, Paul Bartley, Fawn Bracy, Hillary Caldwell, Anthony J. Downs, Cory Greene, Jan Haldipur, Prakriti Hassan, Einat Manoff, Nadine Sheppard, Jacqueline Yates

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

The Morris Justice Project (MJP) works in an area of New York City that is internationally renowned for its place in urban music and culture as much as the stigma that is associated with its reputation. MJP is an informal collection of collaborators and, through its members, is connected with an academic institution. The Project engaged in research-driven activism which attempted to change aggressive community policing methods. One core idea was to use participatory action research methods to generate fresh data on the official policy of ‘stop and frisk’ of residents who were seen as suspect by police. This data was then discussed with a wider set of local people, and used by MJP as part of a city-wide movement for reform of New York Police Department’s ‘Broken Windows’ and ‘zero tolerance’ policies. Theirs is a powerful and uplifting story of community mobilisation for social justice. With 12 authors actively involved in producing and editing, this writing team is itself an example of co-produced knowledge from the start of the inquiry through to and including writing this contribution. It is an illustration of what it could mean for all parties to take seriously multiple forms of expertise. This is not only about elites or professional experts respecting lived expertise, but includes community experts advocating the value of research, or what one participant in the MJP describes eloquently as ‘coming from a place of knowing’.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Morris Justice Project (MJP) works in an area of New York City that is internationally renowned for its place in urban music and culture as much as the stigma that is associated with its reputation. MJP is an informal collection of collaborators and, through its members, is connected with an academic institution. The Project engaged in research-driven activism which attempted to change aggressive community policing methods. One core idea was to use participatory action research methods to generate fresh data on the official policy of ‘stop and frisk’ of residents who were seen as suspect by police. This data was then discussed with a wider set of local people, and used by MJP as part of a city-wide movement for reform of New York Police Department’s ‘Broken Windows’ and ‘zero tolerance’ policies. Theirs is a powerful and uplifting story of community mobilisation for social justice. With 12 authors actively involved in producing and editing, this writing team is itself an example of co-produced knowledge from the start of the inquiry through to and including writing this contribution. It is an illustration of what it could mean for all parties to take seriously multiple forms of expertise. This is not only about elites or professional experts respecting lived expertise, but includes community experts advocating the value of research, or what one participant in the MJP describes eloquently as ‘coming from a place of knowing’.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Morris Justice Project (MJP) works in an area of New York City that is internationally renowned for its place in urban music and culture as much as the stigma that is associated with its reputation. MJP is an informal collection of collaborators and, through its members, is connected with an academic institution. The Project engaged in research-driven activism which attempted to change aggressive community policing methods. One core idea was to use participatory action research methods to generate fresh data on the official policy of ‘stop and frisk’ of residents who were seen as suspect by police. This data was then discussed with a wider set of local people, and used by MJP as part of a city-wide movement for reform of New York Police Department’s ‘Broken Windows’ and ‘zero tolerance’ policies. Theirs is a powerful and uplifting story of community mobilisation for social justice. With 12 authors actively involved in producing and editing, this writing team is itself an example of co-produced knowledge from the start of the inquiry through to and including writing this contribution. It is an illustration of what it could mean for all parties to take seriously multiple forms of expertise. This is not only about elites or professional experts respecting lived expertise, but includes community experts advocating the value of research, or what one participant in the MJP describes eloquently as ‘coming from a place of knowing’.

Key concepts: Participatory action research, Citizen journalism, Action (physics), Action research, Political science, Sociology, Anthropology, Pedagogy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Participatory action research and policy change — Research Paper | ScholarLens