1953Transactions of the Faculty of ActuariesRequires access

Valuation of Group Pension Schemes

G. C. Philip, W. I. S. Robson

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Synopsis In the first part of the paper the general nature of the problem is dealt with in relation to the movements which take place in group pension schemes and the information which is readily available from the normal office records. The choice of valuation date is discussed and some of the differences which exist between private funds and office schemes and which lead to essentially different treatment are noted. The valuation of schemes providing future service pension by the single and annual premium methods is discussed separately, each being developed from a consideration of the simplest form of contract to the more elaborate forms, and approached from the standpoint of the net premium and gross premium methods of valuation. Under each heading theoretical formulas are given and these are considered from the practical standpoint of designing accurate valuation methods and of devising, without appreciable loss of accuracy, approximate methods which reduce considerably the arithmetical work. Throughout, the effort is made to reduce the data to be recorded to a minimum and to use, wherever possible, the data which an office will require for its costing purposes. The paper includes a section on past service pension in which is given a theoretical review of the various methods commonly used to provide pensions. In the appendices it is demonstrated how Trachtenberg's formula may be adapted for valuation of a single premium scheme by the net premium approach and an example is given of the working of the suggested short method in the valuation of an actual scheme together with a valuation “in extenso” for comparison of the results obtained.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Synopsis In the first part of the paper the general nature of the problem is dealt with in relation to the movements which take place in group pension schemes and the information which is readily available from the normal office records. The choice of valuation date is discussed and some of the differences which exist between private funds and office schemes and which lead to essentially different treatment are noted. The valuation of schemes providing future service pension by the single and annual premium methods is discussed separately, each being developed from a consideration of the simplest form of contract to the more elaborate forms, and approached from the standpoint of the net premium and gross premium methods of valuation. Under each heading theoretical formulas are given and these are considered from the practical standpoint of designing accurate valuation methods and of devising, without appreciable loss of accuracy, approximate methods which reduce considerably the arithmetical work. Throughout, the effort is made to reduce the data to be recorded to a minimum and to use, wherever possible, the data which an office will require for its costing purposes. The paper includes a section on past service pension in which is given a theoretical review of the various methods commonly used to provide pensions. In the appendices it is demonstrated how Trachtenberg's formula may be adapted for valuation of a single premium scheme by the net premium approach and an example is given of the working of the suggested short method in the valuation of an actual scheme together with a valuation “in extenso” for comparison of the results obtained.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Synopsis In the first part of the paper the general nature of the problem is dealt with in relation to the movements which take place in group pension schemes and the information which is readily available from the normal office records. The choice of valuation date is discussed and some of the differences which exist between private funds and office schemes and which lead to essentially different treatment are noted. The valuation of schemes providing future service pension by the single and annual premium methods is discussed separately, each being developed from a consideration of the simplest form of contract to the more elaborate forms, and approached from the standpoint of the net premium and gross premium methods of valuation. Under each heading theoretical formulas are given and these are considered from the practical standpoint of designing accurate valuation methods and of devising, without appreciable loss of accuracy, approximate methods which reduce considerably the arithmetical work. Throughout, the effort is made to reduce the data to be recorded to a minimum and to use, wherever possible, the data which an office will require for its costing purposes. The paper includes a section on past service pension in which is given a theoretical review of the various methods commonly used to provide pensions. In the appendices it is demonstrated how Trachtenberg's formula may be adapted for valuation of a single premium scheme by the net premium approach and an example is given of the working of the suggested short method in the valuation of an actual scheme together with a valuation “in extenso” for comparison of the results obtained.

Key concepts: Valuation (finance), Pension, Actuarial science, Economics, Computer science, Econometrics, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Valuation of Group Pension Schemes — Research Paper | ScholarLens