2003PubMedRequires access

[Neurosurgical treatment of spasticity: indications in children].

I. Hodgkinson, M. Sindou

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Today, we have several efficient neurosurgical treatments of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. A good indication is possible only if a consensus about the goal of the surgery is found between the surgeon, the child and his/her family, and the reeducation team. This goal is not always functional. Clinical examination is not limited to the analytical assessment of spasticity, but must take into account the general and orthopedic state of the child, and his/her functional evolution, cognitive abilities, habits and general environment. The struggle against spasticity is part of a therapeutical programme which extends over several years. It must be considered before muscular contractures. On lower limbs, in the cases of general spasticity, we propose posterior rhizotomy or intrathecal baclofen administration. Posterior rhizotomy is proposed when a more aggressive intervention is preferred for some muscular groups or when the child's general environment does not allow for the medical care imposed by intrathecal administration. In the case of localized spasticity, botulinum toxin injection permits delaying until the child reaches the age for selective neurotomy. On upper limbs, in children with quadriplegia the indication is essentially physical and occupational therapy. We cannot count on the positive side effects of rhizotomy or intrathecal administration of baclofen on the upper limbs. In children with hemiplegia, with localized or global spasticity of the upper limb, botulinum toxin is proposed as the first form of treatment. Neurotomy or rhizotomy can follow toxin, according to the efficacy of the toxin.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Today, we have several efficient neurosurgical treatments of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. A good indication is possible only if a consensus about the goal of the surgery is found between the surgeon, the child and his/her family, and the reeducation team. This goal is not always functional. Clinical examination is not limited to the analytical assessment of spasticity, but must take into account the general and orthopedic state of the child, and his/her functional evolution, cognitive abilities, habits and general environment. The struggle against spasticity is part of a therapeutical programme which extends over several years. It must be considered before muscular contractures. On lower limbs, in the cases of general spasticity, we propose posterior rhizotomy or intrathecal baclofen administration. Posterior rhizotomy is proposed when a more aggressive intervention is preferred for some muscular groups or when the child's general environment does not allow for the medical care imposed by intrathecal administration. In the case of localized spasticity, botulinum toxin injection permits delaying until the child reaches the age for selective neurotomy. On upper limbs, in children with quadriplegia the indication is essentially physical and occupational therapy. We cannot count on the positive side effects of rhizotomy or intrathecal administration of baclofen on the upper limbs. In children with hemiplegia, with localized or global spasticity of the upper limb, botulinum toxin is proposed as the first form of treatment. Neurotomy or rhizotomy can follow toxin, according to the efficacy of the toxin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Today, we have several efficient neurosurgical treatments of spasticity in children with cerebral palsy. A good indication is possible only if a consensus about the goal of the surgery is found between the surgeon, the child and his/her family, and the reeducation team. This goal is not always functional. Clinical examination is not limited to the analytical assessment of spasticity, but must take into account the general and orthopedic state of the child, and his/her functional evolution, cognitive abilities, habits and general environment. The struggle against spasticity is part of a therapeutical programme which extends over several years. It must be considered before muscular contractures. On lower limbs, in the cases of general spasticity, we propose posterior rhizotomy or intrathecal baclofen administration. Posterior rhizotomy is proposed when a more aggressive intervention is preferred for some muscular groups or when the child's general environment does not allow for the medical care imposed by intrathecal administration. In the case of localized spasticity, botulinum toxin injection permits delaying until the child reaches the age for selective neurotomy. On upper limbs, in children with quadriplegia the indication is essentially physical and occupational therapy. We cannot count on the positive side effects of rhizotomy or intrathecal administration of baclofen on the upper limbs. In children with hemiplegia, with localized or global spasticity of the upper limb, botulinum toxin is proposed as the first form of treatment. Neurotomy or rhizotomy can follow toxin, according to the efficacy of the toxin.

Key concepts: Spasticity, Rhizotomy, Medicine, Neurotomy, Cerebral palsy, Botulinum toxin, Dystonia, Baclofen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Neurosurgical treatment of spasticity: indications in children]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens