1977•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The National Identity

Théodore Zeldin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter reviews the many factors that shaped French national identity. The principles of civilisation, the bonds of race, and the French language as an expression of these were put forward as the main factors which made the inhabitants of France into Frenchmen, conscious of their nationality. However, French ‘nationalism’ as a creed went far beyond this. Paradoxically, nationalism was a source of division among Frenchmen, because it became the instrument through which quite different political ideas were propagated. Thus on the one hand, nationalism was at first equated with liberalism or revolution: it was the Jacobin doctrine of the emancipation of oppressed peoples; the leaders of the Third Republic, from Gambetta to Clemenceau, proclaimed themselves heirs of this tradition, and the conservatives attacked them. On the other hand, nationalism, at the turn of the century, emerged also as a reactionary doctrine, protesting against the way French life was developing: Barrès found in anti-Semitism a passion around which Frenchmen could reunite, against what he called decadence; Maurras was anxious that his generation should not be ‘the last of the French’. All the different varieties of nationalism therefore aroused bitter hostility among Frenchmen, for they always emphasised only one aspect of the nation's values.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter reviews the many factors that shaped French national identity. The principles of civilisation, the bonds of race, and the French language as an expression of these were put forward as the main factors which made the inhabitants of France into Frenchmen, conscious of their nationality. However, French ‘nationalism’ as a creed went far beyond this. Paradoxically, nationalism was a source of division among Frenchmen, because it became the instrument through which quite different political ideas were propagated. Thus on the one hand, nationalism was at first equated with liberalism or revolution: it was the Jacobin doctrine of the emancipation of oppressed peoples; the leaders of the Third Republic, from Gambetta to Clemenceau, proclaimed themselves heirs of this tradition, and the conservatives attacked them. On the other hand, nationalism, at the turn of the century, emerged also as a reactionary doctrine, protesting against the way French life was developing: Barrès found in anti-Semitism a passion around which Frenchmen could reunite, against what he called decadence; Maurras was anxious that his generation should not be ‘the last of the French’. All the different varieties of nationalism therefore aroused bitter hostility among Frenchmen, for they always emphasised only one aspect of the nation's values.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter reviews the many factors that shaped French national identity. The principles of civilisation, the bonds of race, and the French language as an expression of these were put forward as the main factors which made the inhabitants of France into Frenchmen, conscious of their nationality. However, French ‘nationalism’ as a creed went far beyond this. Paradoxically, nationalism was a source of division among Frenchmen, because it became the instrument through which quite different political ideas were propagated. Thus on the one hand, nationalism was at first equated with liberalism or revolution: it was the Jacobin doctrine of the emancipation of oppressed peoples; the leaders of the Third Republic, from Gambetta to Clemenceau, proclaimed themselves heirs of this tradition, and the conservatives attacked them. On the other hand, nationalism, at the turn of the century, emerged also as a reactionary doctrine, protesting against the way French life was developing: Barrès found in anti-Semitism a passion around which Frenchmen could reunite, against what he called decadence; Maurras was anxious that his generation should not be ‘the last of the French’. All the different varieties of nationalism therefore aroused bitter hostility among Frenchmen, for they always emphasised only one aspect of the nation's values.

Key concepts: Nationalism, Reactionary, National identity, Politics, Civilization, Doctrine, Liberalism, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The National Identity — Research Paper | ScholarLens