Interpreting Population Policy in Nigeria
Elisha P. Renne
Abstract
Elisha P. Renne
Abstract
This chapter focuses on population policy in Nigeria, beginning with the first Nigerian national population policy, introduced in 1988 as the “Four is Enough” campaign, and ending with the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning initiative. While the 1988 policy led to increased availability of contraceptives, women’s groups complained about the policy’s focus on women’s fertility and its failure to incorporate reproductive health into its purview. Others criticized the emphasis on contraceptives when free primary healthcare was curtailed as part of the national structural adjustment program in 1986. This disconnect between the government population policy and local concerns has contributed to continuing high levels of fertility. Without sufficient health services to reduce maternal and infant mortality or government provision of electricity and water to improve living standards, population policies remain irrelevant when having many children is a means of offsetting the uncertainties of everyday life in Nigeria.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter focuses on population policy in Nigeria, beginning with the first Nigerian national population policy, introduced in 1988 as the “Four is Enough” campaign, and ending with the 2012 London Summit on Family Planning initiative. While the 1988 policy led to increased availability of contraceptives, women’s groups complained about the policy’s focus on women’s fertility and its failure to incorporate reproductive health into its purview. Others criticized the emphasis on contraceptives when free primary healthcare was curtailed as part of the national structural adjustment program in 1986. This disconnect between the government population policy and local concerns has contributed to continuing high levels of fertility. Without sufficient health services to reduce maternal and infant mortality or government provision of electricity and water to improve living standards, population policies remain irrelevant when having many children is a means of offsetting the uncertainties of everyday life in Nigeria.
Key concepts: Political science, Geography