Untitled research work
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Lenin, in a speech delivered to an audience of workers a few days after the announcement of NEP, distinguished three classes in the Soviet social order: the proletariat, which, as the result of its superhuman exertions in the revolution and the civil war, was now “extremely weary and exhausted and extremely worn out”; the petty bourgeoisie, which he identified with the peasantry and described as “an independent class, that class which, after the annihilation of landowners and capitalists, remains the only class capable of resisting the proletariat”; and the “landowners and capitalists”, who were “here … at present nowhere to be seen”, but still constituted a powerful enemy abroad.1 After nearly two years’ experience of NEP, in one of his last published articles, Lenin eliminated the “landowners and capitalists” but introduced a new category: the social order in the Soviet republic was “based on the cooperation of two classes — workers and peasants — to which are now also admitted on certain conditions the nepmen, i.e. the bourgeoisie”.2 From this time the “new bourgeoisie” or “new bourgeois strata” were constantly mentioned in party literature, being identified with “traders, private lessees of enterprises, various free professions in town and country, rural kulaks etc.” or, more briefly, “kulaks in the country, nepmen in the town”.3
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Lenin, in a speech delivered to an audience of workers a few days after the announcement of NEP, distinguished three classes in the Soviet social order: the proletariat, which, as the result of its superhuman exertions in the revolution and the civil war, was now “extremely weary and exhausted and extremely worn out”; the petty bourgeoisie, which he identified with the peasantry and described as “an independent class, that class which, after the annihilation of landowners and capitalists, remains the only class capable of resisting the proletariat”; and the “landowners and capitalists”, who were “here … at present nowhere to be seen”, but still constituted a powerful enemy abroad.1 After nearly two years’ experience of NEP, in one of his last published articles, Lenin eliminated the “landowners and capitalists” but introduced a new category: the social order in the Soviet republic was “based on the cooperation of two classes — workers and peasants — to which are now also admitted on certain conditions the nepmen, i.e. the bourgeoisie”.2 From this time the “new bourgeoisie” or “new bourgeois strata” were constantly mentioned in party literature, being identified with “traders, private lessees of enterprises, various free professions in town and country, rural kulaks etc.” or, more briefly, “kulaks in the country, nepmen in the town”.3
Key concepts: Proletariat, Bourgeoisie, Petite bourgeoisie, Working class, Order (exchange), Social class, Political science, Economic history