Ordering Paradigms in International Investment Law: Bilateralism—Multilateralism—Multilateralization
Stephan W. Schill
Abstract
Stephan W. Schill
Abstract
This chapter first examines the concepts of bilateralism and multilateralism, and their relevance. It then introduces the notion of multilateralization as a perspective that can overcome a schematic and static vision on ordering paradigms in international investment law (IIL). It focuses on the main source of IIL, namely international investment treaties, because these instruments are constitutive for the modern practice of IIL and investor-state arbitration. It shows how multilateral rationales play out in present-day IIL without claiming that bilateral thinking is inexistent in practice. It goes on to bridge the theoretical debate about ordering paradigms into practice and discusses how multilateral rationales play out in investment treaty arbitration, in particular in the process of interpretation of international investment agreements (IIAs), in reason-giving in arbitral decisions, and in the conceptualization of the role of arbitrators.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter first examines the concepts of bilateralism and multilateralism, and their relevance. It then introduces the notion of multilateralization as a perspective that can overcome a schematic and static vision on ordering paradigms in international investment law (IIL). It focuses on the main source of IIL, namely international investment treaties, because these instruments are constitutive for the modern practice of IIL and investor-state arbitration. It shows how multilateral rationales play out in present-day IIL without claiming that bilateral thinking is inexistent in practice. It goes on to bridge the theoretical debate about ordering paradigms into practice and discusses how multilateral rationales play out in investment treaty arbitration, in particular in the process of interpretation of international investment agreements (IIAs), in reason-giving in arbitral decisions, and in the conceptualization of the role of arbitrators.
Key concepts: Bilateralism, Multilateralism, International investment, Political science, Investment (military), International trade, Law and economics, Economics