2014Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Ordering Paradigms in International Investment Law: Bilateralism—Multilateralism—Multilateralization

Stephan W. Schill

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

This chapter first examines the concepts of bilateralism and multilateralism, and their relevance. It then introduces the notion of multilateralization as a perspective that can overcome a schematic and static vision on ordering paradigms in international investment law (IIL). It focuses on the main source of IIL, namely international investment treaties, because these instruments are constitutive for the modern practice of IIL and investor-state arbitration. It shows how multilateral rationales play out in present-day IIL without claiming that bilateral thinking is inexistent in practice. It goes on to bridge the theoretical debate about ordering paradigms into practice and discusses how multilateral rationales play out in investment treaty arbitration, in particular in the process of interpretation of international investment agreements (IIAs), in reason-giving in arbitral decisions, and in the conceptualization of the role of arbitrators.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter first examines the concepts of bilateralism and multilateralism, and their relevance. It then introduces the notion of multilateralization as a perspective that can overcome a schematic and static vision on ordering paradigms in international investment law (IIL). It focuses on the main source of IIL, namely international investment treaties, because these instruments are constitutive for the modern practice of IIL and investor-state arbitration. It shows how multilateral rationales play out in present-day IIL without claiming that bilateral thinking is inexistent in practice. It goes on to bridge the theoretical debate about ordering paradigms into practice and discusses how multilateral rationales play out in investment treaty arbitration, in particular in the process of interpretation of international investment agreements (IIAs), in reason-giving in arbitral decisions, and in the conceptualization of the role of arbitrators.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter first examines the concepts of bilateralism and multilateralism, and their relevance. It then introduces the notion of multilateralization as a perspective that can overcome a schematic and static vision on ordering paradigms in international investment law (IIL). It focuses on the main source of IIL, namely international investment treaties, because these instruments are constitutive for the modern practice of IIL and investor-state arbitration. It shows how multilateral rationales play out in present-day IIL without claiming that bilateral thinking is inexistent in practice. It goes on to bridge the theoretical debate about ordering paradigms into practice and discusses how multilateral rationales play out in investment treaty arbitration, in particular in the process of interpretation of international investment agreements (IIAs), in reason-giving in arbitral decisions, and in the conceptualization of the role of arbitrators.

Key concepts: Bilateralism, Multilateralism, International investment, Political science, Investment (military), International trade, Law and economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ordering Paradigms in International Investment Law: Bilateralism—Multilateralism—Multilateralization — Research Paper | ScholarLens