2011Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

A Compatibilist Account of Agent Causation

Dana Kay Nelkin

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter addresses the metaphysics of free and responsible agency. Most theorists today presuppose a theory of causation according to which causes and effects are events of one kind or other (“event causation”), and human action is no different. A smaller group, almost exclusively composed of incompatibilists — those who deny that freedom and determinism are compatible — adopt a theory according to which the causes of human action are agents (“agent causation”), and not simply events involving them. This chapter presents a theory of responsibility that is compatible with either sort of theory of causation, and argues that there are distinct advantages to the latter, especially when we adopt a version that does not single out a kind of causation for human action that differs from the kind of causation found elsewhere in the world. The view set out provides a new way of looking at the long-running debate about agent causation and the metaphysics of freedom more generally.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter addresses the metaphysics of free and responsible agency. Most theorists today presuppose a theory of causation according to which causes and effects are events of one kind or other (“event causation”), and human action is no different. A smaller group, almost exclusively composed of incompatibilists — those who deny that freedom and determinism are compatible — adopt a theory according to which the causes of human action are agents (“agent causation”), and not simply events involving them. This chapter presents a theory of responsibility that is compatible with either sort of theory of causation, and argues that there are distinct advantages to the latter, especially when we adopt a version that does not single out a kind of causation for human action that differs from the kind of causation found elsewhere in the world. The view set out provides a new way of looking at the long-running debate about agent causation and the metaphysics of freedom more generally.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter addresses the metaphysics of free and responsible agency. Most theorists today presuppose a theory of causation according to which causes and effects are events of one kind or other (“event causation”), and human action is no different. A smaller group, almost exclusively composed of incompatibilists — those who deny that freedom and determinism are compatible — adopt a theory according to which the causes of human action are agents (“agent causation”), and not simply events involving them. This chapter presents a theory of responsibility that is compatible with either sort of theory of causation, and argues that there are distinct advantages to the latter, especially when we adopt a version that does not single out a kind of causation for human action that differs from the kind of causation found elsewhere in the world. The view set out provides a new way of looking at the long-running debate about agent causation and the metaphysics of freedom more generally.

Key concepts: Causation, Compatibilism, Incompatibilism, Metaphysics, Epistemology, Determinism, Free will, Action (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Compatibilist Account of Agent Causation — Research Paper | ScholarLens