2009•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

East Pakistani livelihoods

Willem van Schendel

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The political collapse of Pakistan had deep roots in economic frustration. In the 1940s, most supporters of Pakistan had been full of hope for the Bengal delta's rapid improvement. They thought that independence was bound to make the region flourish because it would rid itself of the exploitative colonial system and remove the landlords, merchants and officials who had personified it. Of course, Partition would create initial dislocations that needed to be overcome but the longer-term prospects were thought to be bright. After Partition, however, things suddenly looked much more complicated. The Muslim League leadership was ill-prepared to govern, its policies were not geared towards invigorating the Bengal delta economy and its attempts to construct a national economy turned out to have numerous unanticipated effects. Moreover, population exchange was far more extensive and disruptive than had been expected. The early years of East Pakistan, as the Bengal delta was now known, were characterised not only by political volatility but also by economic turmoil. POPULATION EXCHANGE The Partition of 1947 was a demographic disruption of the first order. Huge numbers of people were on the move. In the Punjab, in the west, population exchange was a massive and swift fratricidal horror. In Bengal it was slower, not quite so violent, but equally massive. Here migration prefiguring Partition had begun in 1946, after riots in Kolkata, Noakhali and Bihar. In August 1947, at the time of Partition, a number of distinct groups began to migrate.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The political collapse of Pakistan had deep roots in economic frustration. In the 1940s, most supporters of Pakistan had been full of hope for the Bengal delta's rapid improvement. They thought that independence was bound to make the region flourish because it would rid itself of the exploitative colonial system and remove the landlords, merchants and officials who had personified it. Of course, Partition would create initial dislocations that needed to be overcome but the longer-term prospects were thought to be bright. After Partition, however, things suddenly looked much more complicated. The Muslim League leadership was ill-prepared to govern, its policies were not geared towards invigorating the Bengal delta economy and its attempts to construct a national economy turned out to have numerous unanticipated effects. Moreover, population exchange was far more extensive and disruptive than had been expected. The early years of East Pakistan, as the Bengal delta was now known, were characterised not only by political volatility but also by economic turmoil. POPULATION EXCHANGE The Partition of 1947 was a demographic disruption of the first order. Huge numbers of people were on the move. In the Punjab, in the west, population exchange was a massive and swift fratricidal horror. In Bengal it was slower, not quite so violent, but equally massive. Here migration prefiguring Partition had begun in 1946, after riots in Kolkata, Noakhali and Bihar. In August 1947, at the time of Partition, a number of distinct groups began to migrate.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The political collapse of Pakistan had deep roots in economic frustration. In the 1940s, most supporters of Pakistan had been full of hope for the Bengal delta's rapid improvement. They thought that independence was bound to make the region flourish because it would rid itself of the exploitative colonial system and remove the landlords, merchants and officials who had personified it. Of course, Partition would create initial dislocations that needed to be overcome but the longer-term prospects were thought to be bright. After Partition, however, things suddenly looked much more complicated. The Muslim League leadership was ill-prepared to govern, its policies were not geared towards invigorating the Bengal delta economy and its attempts to construct a national economy turned out to have numerous unanticipated effects. Moreover, population exchange was far more extensive and disruptive than had been expected. The early years of East Pakistan, as the Bengal delta was now known, were characterised not only by political volatility but also by economic turmoil. POPULATION EXCHANGE The Partition of 1947 was a demographic disruption of the first order. Huge numbers of people were on the move. In the Punjab, in the west, population exchange was a massive and swift fratricidal horror. In Bengal it was slower, not quite so violent, but equally massive. Here migration prefiguring Partition had begun in 1946, after riots in Kolkata, Noakhali and Bihar. In August 1947, at the time of Partition, a number of distinct groups began to migrate.

Key concepts: Livelihood, Geography, Archaeology, Agriculture

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
East Pakistani livelihoods — Research Paper | ScholarLens