1999Australian Health ReviewOpen access

A future for primary health care in New Zealand [Commentary by Rob Pegram, pp. 132–134]

Barry Gribben, Gregor Coster

Open full text 2 citations

Abstract

The attempt to implement a health market in New Zealand by separating funders and providers in 1992 has not delivered improved health outcomes. Indeed there is increasing concern that deprived populations are not accessing appropriate health care. This article describes the models of primary care that have evolved in the new environment and suggests that these new structures, given appropriate support, are ideally placed to increase the focus of primary care on population health. A capitation funding model with patient enrolment and low fee-for-service barriers is proposed as the most promising model for delivering improved health outcomes. The model incorporates a needs-based funding formula, locality health needs assessment, an increased role for primary care nurses and improved responsiveness to local communities, especially Maori.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The attempt to implement a health market in New Zealand by separating funders and providers in 1992 has not delivered improved health outcomes. Indeed there is increasing concern that deprived populations are not accessing appropriate health care. This article describes the models of primary care that have evolved in the new environment and suggests that these new structures, given appropriate support, are ideally placed to increase the focus of primary care on population health. A capitation funding model with patient enrolment and low fee-for-service barriers is proposed as the most promising model for delivering improved health outcomes. The model incorporates a needs-based funding formula, locality health needs assessment, an increased role for primary care nurses and improved responsiveness to local communities, especially Maori.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The attempt to implement a health market in New Zealand by separating funders and providers in 1992 has not delivered improved health outcomes. Indeed there is increasing concern that deprived populations are not accessing appropriate health care. This article describes the models of primary care that have evolved in the new environment and suggests that these new structures, given appropriate support, are ideally placed to increase the focus of primary care on population health. A capitation funding model with patient enrolment and low fee-for-service barriers is proposed as the most promising model for delivering improved health outcomes. The model incorporates a needs-based funding formula, locality health needs assessment, an increased role for primary care nurses and improved responsiveness to local communities, especially Maori.

Key concepts: Capitation, Population health, Health economics, Primary care, Health care, Primary health care, Nursing, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A future for primary health care in New Zealand [Commentary by Rob Pegram, pp. 132–134] — Research Paper | ScholarLens