2009•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The Very Ends of Poesy

Gregory A. Staley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Seneca does not compose a poetics, but he regularly shows in his prose writings a wide knowledge of ancient poetic theory. This chapter examines Seneca’s own occasional comments on poetry and the various theories based upon them that scholars have advanced to explain his tragedies: Seneca as Stoic moralist, as aristocrat at play, or as Platonic “mad” poet. None of the theories that have been woven from Seneca’s occasional comments on poetry, however, provides the essential clue to the “end” of Senecan tragedy, for none of them focuses on tragedy in particular and on the critical traditions in which it was featured. The search for a Senecan poetics that might explain Senecan tragedy has failed essentially because it has not focused on what Seneca says about epistemology and psychology, the basis on which after Plato the traditional poetics of tragedy had been established.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Seneca does not compose a poetics, but he regularly shows in his prose writings a wide knowledge of ancient poetic theory. This chapter examines Seneca’s own occasional comments on poetry and the various theories based upon them that scholars have advanced to explain his tragedies: Seneca as Stoic moralist, as aristocrat at play, or as Platonic “mad” poet. None of the theories that have been woven from Seneca’s occasional comments on poetry, however, provides the essential clue to the “end” of Senecan tragedy, for none of them focuses on tragedy in particular and on the critical traditions in which it was featured. The search for a Senecan poetics that might explain Senecan tragedy has failed essentially because it has not focused on what Seneca says about epistemology and psychology, the basis on which after Plato the traditional poetics of tragedy had been established.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Seneca does not compose a poetics, but he regularly shows in his prose writings a wide knowledge of ancient poetic theory. This chapter examines Seneca’s own occasional comments on poetry and the various theories based upon them that scholars have advanced to explain his tragedies: Seneca as Stoic moralist, as aristocrat at play, or as Platonic “mad” poet. None of the theories that have been woven from Seneca’s occasional comments on poetry, however, provides the essential clue to the “end” of Senecan tragedy, for none of them focuses on tragedy in particular and on the critical traditions in which it was featured. The search for a Senecan poetics that might explain Senecan tragedy has failed essentially because it has not focused on what Seneca says about epistemology and psychology, the basis on which after Plato the traditional poetics of tragedy had been established.

Key concepts: Poetics, Tragedy (event), Literature, Poetry, Philosophy, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Very Ends of Poesy — Research Paper | ScholarLens