1984ASA special publicationRequires access

Economics of Farming Systems

Harold F. Breimyer

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Organic farming practices by their nature change social cost accounting, as they tend to internalize and make contemporaneous the various costs including those of conservation. They may reduce the return to labor and add to the total labor requirement of U.S. agriculture. The most significant meaning of organic practices may lie in their social accounting. Some organic practices, on the other hand, have long-run benefits to the farm where they are applied. Moreover, they not only protect runoff water now, but build up and protect soil for the future. Organic farming is not homogeneous. In a sense, it is even scarcely fitting to pose a general question about the economics of organic farming. Environmental issues in agriculture often turn on whether costs and/or benefits are internalized or externalized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Organic farming practices by their nature change social cost accounting, as they tend to internalize and make contemporaneous the various costs including those of conservation. They may reduce the return to labor and add to the total labor requirement of U.S. agriculture. The most significant meaning of organic practices may lie in their social accounting. Some organic practices, on the other hand, have long-run benefits to the farm where they are applied. Moreover, they not only protect runoff water now, but build up and protect soil for the future. Organic farming is not homogeneous. In a sense, it is even scarcely fitting to pose a general question about the economics of organic farming. Environmental issues in agriculture often turn on whether costs and/or benefits are internalized or externalized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Organic farming practices by their nature change social cost accounting, as they tend to internalize and make contemporaneous the various costs including those of conservation. They may reduce the return to labor and add to the total labor requirement of U.S. agriculture. The most significant meaning of organic practices may lie in their social accounting. Some organic practices, on the other hand, have long-run benefits to the farm where they are applied. Moreover, they not only protect runoff water now, but build up and protect soil for the future. Organic farming is not homogeneous. In a sense, it is even scarcely fitting to pose a general question about the economics of organic farming. Environmental issues in agriculture often turn on whether costs and/or benefits are internalized or externalized.

Key concepts: Agriculture, Organic farming, Meaning (existential), Natural resource economics, Surface runoff, Homogeneous, Economics, Soil conservation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economics of Farming Systems — Research Paper | ScholarLens