1992Journal of PaleontologyRequires access

Algae, proalgae, and eualgae

Leigh M. Van Valen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

As Torres (1991) and others have noted, the term “algae” no longer refers to a taxonomically useful group. It does, though, refer to an easily recognized adaptive facies. This adaptive facies contains both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as do various others (e.g., nanoplankton or decomposers). The blue-green algae are thus indeed algae in this useful sense. More than terminology is involved, because a concept like that of adaptive facies can be forgotten if we focus solely on taxa. The terms “proalgae” and “eualgae” can be used transparently when we want to distinguish prokaryotic from eukaryotic algae. “Proalgae” has in fact been proposed as a formal taxon (Van Valen, 1986); the terms come from Van Valen and Maiorana (1980). Similarly, one can refer to the nonhomologous kinds of flagellae as proflagellae and euflagellae while retaining a general term.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As Torres (1991) and others have noted, the term “algae” no longer refers to a taxonomically useful group. It does, though, refer to an easily recognized adaptive facies. This adaptive facies contains both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as do various others (e.g., nanoplankton or decomposers). The blue-green algae are thus indeed algae in this useful sense. More than terminology is involved, because a concept like that of adaptive facies can be forgotten if we focus solely on taxa. The terms “proalgae” and “eualgae” can be used transparently when we want to distinguish prokaryotic from eukaryotic algae. “Proalgae” has in fact been proposed as a formal taxon (Van Valen, 1986); the terms come from Van Valen and Maiorana (1980). Similarly, one can refer to the nonhomologous kinds of flagellae as proflagellae and euflagellae while retaining a general term.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As Torres (1991) and others have noted, the term “algae” no longer refers to a taxonomically useful group. It does, though, refer to an easily recognized adaptive facies. This adaptive facies contains both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, as do various others (e.g., nanoplankton or decomposers). The blue-green algae are thus indeed algae in this useful sense. More than terminology is involved, because a concept like that of adaptive facies can be forgotten if we focus solely on taxa. The terms “proalgae” and “eualgae” can be used transparently when we want to distinguish prokaryotic from eukaryotic algae. “Proalgae” has in fact been proposed as a formal taxon (Van Valen, 1986); the terms come from Van Valen and Maiorana (1980). Similarly, one can refer to the nonhomologous kinds of flagellae as proflagellae and euflagellae while retaining a general term.

Key concepts: Facies, Algae, Taxon, Terminology, Biology, Paleontology, Term (time), Decomposer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Algae, proalgae, and eualgae — Research Paper | ScholarLens