1993•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946)

G. C. Harcourt

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

To understand Keynes’s revolutionary contributions to economics it is important to remember that though he read mathematics at Cambridge as an undergraduate, he spent as much time on philosophy, and subsequently became an original philosopher in his own right. His first major publication, A Treatise on Probability (1921), was on philosophical issues; it was originally written in 1908–9 as a Fellowship dissertation for King’s. Though he was to respond to criticism of it, especially by Frank Ramsey, it nevertheless continued to provide the base for all aspects of his intellectual work. For his thinking about economics he took three lasting lessons from his philosophical understanding; first, the argument that there is a whole spectrum of languages, running continuously from intuition and poetry to mathematics and formal logic, all of which may be relevant at appropriate steps in arguments and for particular issues, or aspects of issues, in economics. Second, there was his realisation that in a discipline such as economics the whole may be more than the sum of the parts, a realisation he came to long before he wrote The General Theory , in which, of course, it played a crucial role. Third, Keynes thought of probability as a form of objective belief and of uncertainty as an absence of probabilistic knowledge — ‘we simply do not know’ (see Lawson, 1993). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

To understand Keynes’s revolutionary contributions to economics it is important to remember that though he read mathematics at Cambridge as an undergraduate, he spent as much time on philosophy, and subsequently became an original philosopher in his own right. His first major publication, A Treatise on Probability (1921), was on philosophical issues; it was originally written in 1908–9 as a Fellowship dissertation for King’s. Though he was to respond to criticism of it, especially by Frank Ramsey, it nevertheless continued to provide the base for all aspects of his intellectual work. For his thinking about economics he took three lasting lessons from his philosophical understanding; first, the argument that there is a whole spectrum of languages, running continuously from intuition and poetry to mathematics and formal logic, all of which may be relevant at appropriate steps in arguments and for particular issues, or aspects of issues, in economics. Second, there was his realisation that in a discipline such as economics the whole may be more than the sum of the parts, a realisation he came to long before he wrote The General Theory , in which, of course, it played a crucial role. Third, Keynes thought of probability as a form of objective belief and of uncertainty as an absence of probabilistic knowledge — ‘we simply do not know’ (see Lawson, 1993). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

To understand Keynes’s revolutionary contributions to economics it is important to remember that though he read mathematics at Cambridge as an undergraduate, he spent as much time on philosophy, and subsequently became an original philosopher in his own right. His first major publication, A Treatise on Probability (1921), was on philosophical issues; it was originally written in 1908–9 as a Fellowship dissertation for King’s. Though he was to respond to criticism of it, especially by Frank Ramsey, it nevertheless continued to provide the base for all aspects of his intellectual work. For his thinking about economics he took three lasting lessons from his philosophical understanding; first, the argument that there is a whole spectrum of languages, running continuously from intuition and poetry to mathematics and formal logic, all of which may be relevant at appropriate steps in arguments and for particular issues, or aspects of issues, in economics. Second, there was his realisation that in a discipline such as economics the whole may be more than the sum of the parts, a realisation he came to long before he wrote The General Theory , in which, of course, it played a crucial role. Third, Keynes thought of probability as a form of objective belief and of uncertainty as an absence of probabilistic knowledge — ‘we simply do not know’ (see Lawson, 1993). These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Realisation, Intuition, Epistemology, Criticism, Argument (complex analysis), Philosophy, Positive economics, Economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946) — Research Paper | ScholarLens