2003Humana Press eBooksRequires access

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Guided Intervention in the Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer

Susan G. Orel

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

As clinical investigation into the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a breast-imaging tool continues, there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the increased sensitivity of MRI in the detection of breast cancer compared with conventional imaging methods, with reported sensitivities for the visualization of invasive breast cancer approaching 100% (1–5). The reported sensitivities of MRI for the visualization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been more variable, ranging from 40 to 100% (6–10). It has been demonstrated that not only can MRI visualize breast cancer but mammographically, sonographically, and clinically occult breast cancer, both invasive cancer and DCIS, as well. MRI has been shown to be more accurate than mammography and ultrasound in determining the size of the primary breast cancer and in the detection of multifocal, multicentric, and bilateral breast cancer (11–18). In addition to these studies, which have evaluated MRI in the diagnostic setting, there are now reports of MRI-detected breast cancer in the screening setting, specifically in the evaluation of women at high risk for the development of breast cancer (19–21) . These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As clinical investigation into the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a breast-imaging tool continues, there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the increased sensitivity of MRI in the detection of breast cancer compared with conventional imaging methods, with reported sensitivities for the visualization of invasive breast cancer approaching 100% (1–5). The reported sensitivities of MRI for the visualization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been more variable, ranging from 40 to 100% (6–10). It has been demonstrated that not only can MRI visualize breast cancer but mammographically, sonographically, and clinically occult breast cancer, both invasive cancer and DCIS, as well. MRI has been shown to be more accurate than mammography and ultrasound in determining the size of the primary breast cancer and in the detection of multifocal, multicentric, and bilateral breast cancer (11–18). In addition to these studies, which have evaluated MRI in the diagnostic setting, there are now reports of MRI-detected breast cancer in the screening setting, specifically in the evaluation of women at high risk for the development of breast cancer (19–21) . These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As clinical investigation into the utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a breast-imaging tool continues, there is now a large body of evidence demonstrating the increased sensitivity of MRI in the detection of breast cancer compared with conventional imaging methods, with reported sensitivities for the visualization of invasive breast cancer approaching 100% (1–5). The reported sensitivities of MRI for the visualization of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) have been more variable, ranging from 40 to 100% (6–10). It has been demonstrated that not only can MRI visualize breast cancer but mammographically, sonographically, and clinically occult breast cancer, both invasive cancer and DCIS, as well. MRI has been shown to be more accurate than mammography and ultrasound in determining the size of the primary breast cancer and in the detection of multifocal, multicentric, and bilateral breast cancer (11–18). In addition to these studies, which have evaluated MRI in the diagnostic setting, there are now reports of MRI-detected breast cancer in the screening setting, specifically in the evaluation of women at high risk for the development of breast cancer (19–21) . These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Breast cancer, Medicine, Magnetic resonance imaging, Mammography, Radiology, Breast MRI, Ductal carcinoma, Cancer

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Guided Intervention in the Detection and Diagnosis of Breast Cancer — Research Paper | ScholarLens