2003Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

“Support the Left”: PLA Intervention in the Cultural Revolution

Andrew Scobell

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

THE intervention of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1967 has received considerable attention by scholars. The use of PLA units during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (CR) (1966–9) has been viewed as a negative step that proved detrimental to both Chinese politics and the PLA itself. Chinese scholars have not mirrored the attention given by foreign analysts to the extensive intervention of the PLA in the internal affairs of China during the Cultural Revolution. Indeed, official Chinese documents and histories tend to ignore the PLA's significant domestic role during the Cultural Revolution. In one sense, the lack of treatment is nothing short of remarkable since there is widespread consensus that military intervention literally rescued China from the brink of civil war and complete collapse. The price of this rescue was military rule (jun guan) at the local and provincial levels throughout China. However, the PLA never assumed control over the operations of the central government in Beijing. The dearth of coverage of this aspect of a troubled period in PRC history reflects the extreme sensitivity of China's political leaders to the domination – real or perceived – of the military vis-à-vis the civilian (party and state) authorities. Despite this sensitivity, in no way can this intervention be considered a military coup d'etat. The PLA intervened only at the behest of China's top political leader, Mao Zedong, and never took control of the national government.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

THE intervention of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1967 has received considerable attention by scholars. The use of PLA units during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (CR) (1966–9) has been viewed as a negative step that proved detrimental to both Chinese politics and the PLA itself. Chinese scholars have not mirrored the attention given by foreign analysts to the extensive intervention of the PLA in the internal affairs of China during the Cultural Revolution. Indeed, official Chinese documents and histories tend to ignore the PLA's significant domestic role during the Cultural Revolution. In one sense, the lack of treatment is nothing short of remarkable since there is widespread consensus that military intervention literally rescued China from the brink of civil war and complete collapse. The price of this rescue was military rule (jun guan) at the local and provincial levels throughout China. However, the PLA never assumed control over the operations of the central government in Beijing. The dearth of coverage of this aspect of a troubled period in PRC history reflects the extreme sensitivity of China's political leaders to the domination – real or perceived – of the military vis-à-vis the civilian (party and state) authorities. Despite this sensitivity, in no way can this intervention be considered a military coup d'etat. The PLA intervened only at the behest of China's top political leader, Mao Zedong, and never took control of the national government.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

THE intervention of the People's Liberation Army (PLA) in the People's Republic of China (PRC) in 1967 has received considerable attention by scholars. The use of PLA units during the Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution (CR) (1966–9) has been viewed as a negative step that proved detrimental to both Chinese politics and the PLA itself. Chinese scholars have not mirrored the attention given by foreign analysts to the extensive intervention of the PLA in the internal affairs of China during the Cultural Revolution. Indeed, official Chinese documents and histories tend to ignore the PLA's significant domestic role during the Cultural Revolution. In one sense, the lack of treatment is nothing short of remarkable since there is widespread consensus that military intervention literally rescued China from the brink of civil war and complete collapse. The price of this rescue was military rule (jun guan) at the local and provincial levels throughout China. However, the PLA never assumed control over the operations of the central government in Beijing. The dearth of coverage of this aspect of a troubled period in PRC history reflects the extreme sensitivity of China's political leaders to the domination – real or perceived – of the military vis-à-vis the civilian (party and state) authorities. Despite this sensitivity, in no way can this intervention be considered a military coup d'etat. The PLA intervened only at the behest of China's top political leader, Mao Zedong, and never took control of the national government.

Key concepts: Proletariat, Cultural revolution, Intervention (counseling), China, Politics, Political science, Law, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
“Support the Left”: PLA Intervention in the Cultural Revolution — Research Paper | ScholarLens