2010Studies in language companion seriesRequires access

Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification

Svenja Kranich

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

It has often been stated that grammaticalization is accompanied by subjectification (e.g. Traugott 1995), which has been rectified to the idea that this process typically tends to accompany only primary grammaticalization, i.e. the very early stages of grammaticalization (Traugott 2010). Taking this hypothesis further, I will suggest in this paper that, in fact, secondary grammaticalization (i.e. when already grammatical elements/constructions move further down the grammaticalization cline) typically leads to the reverse semantic development: objectification. Evidence comes from the development of perfects, the development of futures and the development of progressives, which all seem to exhibit a loss of subjective meaning as grammaticalization proceeds. The study is limited to languages with long well-documented histories: English, German, Latin, the Romance and the Celtic languages.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has often been stated that grammaticalization is accompanied by subjectification (e.g. Traugott 1995), which has been rectified to the idea that this process typically tends to accompany only primary grammaticalization, i.e. the very early stages of grammaticalization (Traugott 2010). Taking this hypothesis further, I will suggest in this paper that, in fact, secondary grammaticalization (i.e. when already grammatical elements/constructions move further down the grammaticalization cline) typically leads to the reverse semantic development: objectification. Evidence comes from the development of perfects, the development of futures and the development of progressives, which all seem to exhibit a loss of subjective meaning as grammaticalization proceeds. The study is limited to languages with long well-documented histories: English, German, Latin, the Romance and the Celtic languages.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has often been stated that grammaticalization is accompanied by subjectification (e.g. Traugott 1995), which has been rectified to the idea that this process typically tends to accompany only primary grammaticalization, i.e. the very early stages of grammaticalization (Traugott 2010). Taking this hypothesis further, I will suggest in this paper that, in fact, secondary grammaticalization (i.e. when already grammatical elements/constructions move further down the grammaticalization cline) typically leads to the reverse semantic development: objectification. Evidence comes from the development of perfects, the development of futures and the development of progressives, which all seem to exhibit a loss of subjective meaning as grammaticalization proceeds. The study is limited to languages with long well-documented histories: English, German, Latin, the Romance and the Celtic languages.

Key concepts: Subjectification, Grammaticalization, Objectification, Linguistics, Psychology, Sociology, Philosophy, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification — Research Paper | ScholarLens