1997•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

The European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy Conundrum

Jussi M. Hanhimäki

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Defining a common foreign and security policy (CFSP) for the European Union (EU) is one of the hardest tasks the Member States are and will be facing. The problems are obvious. First, there is a sheer logistical concern: how do you get the foreign services of 15 Member States to co-operate with each other effectively? Secondly, there is an institutional problem: where is CFSP going to be ‘made’, and who will be responsible for implementing any decisions — the Western European Union (WEU), the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), or the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE)? Thirdly, there is the problem of defining what ‘security’ means in the second half of the 1990s and what should be placed under the general rubric of ‘foreign policy’ — is security simply a question of national security/defence, or does it involve such issues as the protection of the environment and the regulation of immigration from non-member countries? Lastly, how does one find a common thread to unite the historically divergent members of the EU, some of which have been allied with each other as members of NATO, others that remained neutral throughout the Cold War. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Defining a common foreign and security policy (CFSP) for the European Union (EU) is one of the hardest tasks the Member States are and will be facing. The problems are obvious. First, there is a sheer logistical concern: how do you get the foreign services of 15 Member States to co-operate with each other effectively? Secondly, there is an institutional problem: where is CFSP going to be ‘made’, and who will be responsible for implementing any decisions — the Western European Union (WEU), the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), or the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE)? Thirdly, there is the problem of defining what ‘security’ means in the second half of the 1990s and what should be placed under the general rubric of ‘foreign policy’ — is security simply a question of national security/defence, or does it involve such issues as the protection of the environment and the regulation of immigration from non-member countries? Lastly, how does one find a common thread to unite the historically divergent members of the EU, some of which have been allied with each other as members of NATO, others that remained neutral throughout the Cold War. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Defining a common foreign and security policy (CFSP) for the European Union (EU) is one of the hardest tasks the Member States are and will be facing. The problems are obvious. First, there is a sheer logistical concern: how do you get the foreign services of 15 Member States to co-operate with each other effectively? Secondly, there is an institutional problem: where is CFSP going to be ‘made’, and who will be responsible for implementing any decisions — the Western European Union (WEU), the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO), or the Conference on Security and Co-operation in Europe (CSCE)? Thirdly, there is the problem of defining what ‘security’ means in the second half of the 1990s and what should be placed under the general rubric of ‘foreign policy’ — is security simply a question of national security/defence, or does it involve such issues as the protection of the environment and the regulation of immigration from non-member countries? Lastly, how does one find a common thread to unite the historically divergent members of the EU, some of which have been allied with each other as members of NATO, others that remained neutral throughout the Cold War. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: European union, Security policy, Political science, Member states, Foreign policy, International trade, Rubric, Treaty

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy Conundrum — Research Paper | ScholarLens