2013Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

The European Court of Justice1

Arman Sarvarian

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This chapter examines the procedure and practice of advocacy before the European Court of Justice and General Court of the European Union. In tracing the historical development of advocacy before the Court from the early days of the European Coal and Steel Community to the present day, the chapter identifies issues particular to the admission requirements of the Court (such as the definition of a ‘lawyer’) arising from that history and manifested in its jurisprudence concerning the appearance of non-traditional legal professionals. In explaining the reasons for the relatively low incidence of problems concerning the conduct of agents and counsel in practice, the chapter also identifies a number of cases in which issues arose concerning the integrity of evidence and the honesty of pleadings. It analyses the issues of professional ethics that have arisen in the practice of the Court, including legal professional privilege or confidentiality. The chapter also sets out the limited control of the EU courts over their rules of procedure and the impact of this situation upon the potential professionalization of advocacy in the unique EU context.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter examines the procedure and practice of advocacy before the European Court of Justice and General Court of the European Union. In tracing the historical development of advocacy before the Court from the early days of the European Coal and Steel Community to the present day, the chapter identifies issues particular to the admission requirements of the Court (such as the definition of a ‘lawyer’) arising from that history and manifested in its jurisprudence concerning the appearance of non-traditional legal professionals. In explaining the reasons for the relatively low incidence of problems concerning the conduct of agents and counsel in practice, the chapter also identifies a number of cases in which issues arose concerning the integrity of evidence and the honesty of pleadings. It analyses the issues of professional ethics that have arisen in the practice of the Court, including legal professional privilege or confidentiality. The chapter also sets out the limited control of the EU courts over their rules of procedure and the impact of this situation upon the potential professionalization of advocacy in the unique EU context.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter examines the procedure and practice of advocacy before the European Court of Justice and General Court of the European Union. In tracing the historical development of advocacy before the Court from the early days of the European Coal and Steel Community to the present day, the chapter identifies issues particular to the admission requirements of the Court (such as the definition of a ‘lawyer’) arising from that history and manifested in its jurisprudence concerning the appearance of non-traditional legal professionals. In explaining the reasons for the relatively low incidence of problems concerning the conduct of agents and counsel in practice, the chapter also identifies a number of cases in which issues arose concerning the integrity of evidence and the honesty of pleadings. It analyses the issues of professional ethics that have arisen in the practice of the Court, including legal professional privilege or confidentiality. The chapter also sets out the limited control of the EU courts over their rules of procedure and the impact of this situation upon the potential professionalization of advocacy in the unique EU context.

Key concepts: Political science, Law, Confidentiality, European Union law, European union, Honesty, Context (archaeology), Professionalization

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The European Court of Justice1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens