2003•Unpublished venueRequires access

Objections, Replies, and Philosophical Implications

Shaun Nichols, Stephen P. Stich

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract A number of problems can be raised against the account of mindreading developed in this volume. This chapter seeks to respond to some of the more important objections. The chapter also explores the implications that the theory has for philosophical debates about functionalism and eliminativism.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A number of problems can be raised against the account of mindreading developed in this volume. This chapter seeks to respond to some of the more important objections. The chapter also explores the implications that the theory has for philosophical debates about functionalism and eliminativism.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A number of problems can be raised against the account of mindreading developed in this volume. This chapter seeks to respond to some of the more important objections. The chapter also explores the implications that the theory has for philosophical debates about functionalism and eliminativism.

Key concepts: Eliminative materialism, Functionalism (philosophy of mind), Epistemology, Philosophy, Philosophical theory, Philosophical methodology, Structural functionalism, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Objections, Replies, and Philosophical Implications — Research Paper | ScholarLens