1986Journal of Economic IssuesRequires access

The Endogeneity of Money and Keynes’s General Theory

Gladys Parker Foster

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Monetarist theory and policy continue to occupy a dominant position in the United States in the mid-1980s. Along with the continuing strength of monetarism, however, an idea inconsistent with the monetarist position has come to be rather widely accepted. That is the idea that the quantity of money is endogenously determined. An additional incongruity is that the presentation by John Maynard Keynes in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money of the quantity of money as exogenous is one of the factors that contributed to the resurgence of monetarism and to the repudiation of Keynes's own central thesis by monetarists and others [Keynes 1936]. These developments are seen to be all the more remarkable when it is recognized that Keynes's central thesis in The General Theory seems to require that the quantity of money be endogenously determined and, furthermore, that he seemed to so regard it in some of his other writings both before and after The General Theory. The present study inquires into the endogeneity or exogeneity of the determination of the quantity of money, demonstrates that Keynes's theory of income and employment requires an endogenous theory of money, and shows how Keynes's presentation of money as exogenously determined provided a rationale for attacks on The General Theory.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Monetarist theory and policy continue to occupy a dominant position in the United States in the mid-1980s. Along with the continuing strength of monetarism, however, an idea inconsistent with the monetarist position has come to be rather widely accepted. That is the idea that the quantity of money is endogenously determined. An additional incongruity is that the presentation by John Maynard Keynes in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money of the quantity of money as exogenous is one of the factors that contributed to the resurgence of monetarism and to the repudiation of Keynes's own central thesis by monetarists and others [Keynes 1936]. These developments are seen to be all the more remarkable when it is recognized that Keynes's central thesis in The General Theory seems to require that the quantity of money be endogenously determined and, furthermore, that he seemed to so regard it in some of his other writings both before and after The General Theory. The present study inquires into the endogeneity or exogeneity of the determination of the quantity of money, demonstrates that Keynes's theory of income and employment requires an endogenous theory of money, and shows how Keynes's presentation of money as exogenously determined provided a rationale for attacks on The General Theory.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Monetarist theory and policy continue to occupy a dominant position in the United States in the mid-1980s. Along with the continuing strength of monetarism, however, an idea inconsistent with the monetarist position has come to be rather widely accepted. That is the idea that the quantity of money is endogenously determined. An additional incongruity is that the presentation by John Maynard Keynes in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money of the quantity of money as exogenous is one of the factors that contributed to the resurgence of monetarism and to the repudiation of Keynes's own central thesis by monetarists and others [Keynes 1936]. These developments are seen to be all the more remarkable when it is recognized that Keynes's central thesis in The General Theory seems to require that the quantity of money be endogenously determined and, furthermore, that he seemed to so regard it in some of his other writings both before and after The General Theory. The present study inquires into the endogeneity or exogeneity of the determination of the quantity of money, demonstrates that Keynes's theory of income and employment requires an endogenous theory of money, and shows how Keynes's presentation of money as exogenously determined provided a rationale for attacks on The General Theory.

Key concepts: Monetarism, Economics, Endogeneity, Endogenous money, Keynesian economics, Quantity theory of money, General theory, Post-Keynesian economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Endogeneity of Money and Keynes’s General Theory — Research Paper | ScholarLens