2014•Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

On Chinese and Japanese Relative Clauses and NP-Ellipsis

Yoichi Miyamoto

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the interaction of relativization and NP-ellipsis in Chinese and Japanese and highlights that Chinese relatives being in a position lower than Spec,DP cannot license NP-ellipsis, parallel to Japanese relatives. The chapter proposes that this type of Chinese relatives should be analyzed as being adjoined to NP. The chapter also suggests that the Japanese complementizer no cannot select TP with a predicate in the adnominal form. As a consequence, Kaynean head-raising is not an option available in Japanese relatives because the Kaynean approach requires a CP to be the complement of D. The chapter concludes that, in contrast to Japanese, Chinese has two types of relatives: one is in Spec,DP and the other is adjoined to NP.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the interaction of relativization and NP-ellipsis in Chinese and Japanese and highlights that Chinese relatives being in a position lower than Spec,DP cannot license NP-ellipsis, parallel to Japanese relatives. The chapter proposes that this type of Chinese relatives should be analyzed as being adjoined to NP. The chapter also suggests that the Japanese complementizer no cannot select TP with a predicate in the adnominal form. As a consequence, Kaynean head-raising is not an option available in Japanese relatives because the Kaynean approach requires a CP to be the complement of D. The chapter concludes that, in contrast to Japanese, Chinese has two types of relatives: one is in Spec,DP and the other is adjoined to NP.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the interaction of relativization and NP-ellipsis in Chinese and Japanese and highlights that Chinese relatives being in a position lower than Spec,DP cannot license NP-ellipsis, parallel to Japanese relatives. The chapter proposes that this type of Chinese relatives should be analyzed as being adjoined to NP. The chapter also suggests that the Japanese complementizer no cannot select TP with a predicate in the adnominal form. As a consequence, Kaynean head-raising is not an option available in Japanese relatives because the Kaynean approach requires a CP to be the complement of D. The chapter concludes that, in contrast to Japanese, Chinese has two types of relatives: one is in Spec,DP and the other is adjoined to NP.

Key concepts: Ellipsis (linguistics), Linguistics, Computer science, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
On Chinese and Japanese Relative Clauses and NP-Ellipsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens