2013Unpublished venueRequires access

Assessing Effects of Reforms: Changing the Electoral System

Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Abstract This chapter offers the first of several tests of claims about the transformative effects of electoral reform. It examines what may be seen as the ‘biggest’ of electoral reforms: changes in the electoral system. Much of the attention here is directed at the effects of adopting proportional representation (PR). Advocates of PR, and some academic literature, suggest this reform should increase voter efficacy, increase support for smaller parties, and stimulate political engagement and voter turnout. Examining the effects of the adoption of MMP in New Zealand, as well as the adoption of STV in Australia, suggests changing electoral systems had minimal effects. Additional examples presented here from Germany, Italy, and Japan illustrate no evidence that changes in the electoral system affected turnout. Most results in this chapter contradict findings in research using cross-sectional data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract This chapter offers the first of several tests of claims about the transformative effects of electoral reform. It examines what may be seen as the ‘biggest’ of electoral reforms: changes in the electoral system. Much of the attention here is directed at the effects of adopting proportional representation (PR). Advocates of PR, and some academic literature, suggest this reform should increase voter efficacy, increase support for smaller parties, and stimulate political engagement and voter turnout. Examining the effects of the adoption of MMP in New Zealand, as well as the adoption of STV in Australia, suggests changing electoral systems had minimal effects. Additional examples presented here from Germany, Italy, and Japan illustrate no evidence that changes in the electoral system affected turnout. Most results in this chapter contradict findings in research using cross-sectional data.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract This chapter offers the first of several tests of claims about the transformative effects of electoral reform. It examines what may be seen as the ‘biggest’ of electoral reforms: changes in the electoral system. Much of the attention here is directed at the effects of adopting proportional representation (PR). Advocates of PR, and some academic literature, suggest this reform should increase voter efficacy, increase support for smaller parties, and stimulate political engagement and voter turnout. Examining the effects of the adoption of MMP in New Zealand, as well as the adoption of STV in Australia, suggests changing electoral systems had minimal effects. Additional examples presented here from Germany, Italy, and Japan illustrate no evidence that changes in the electoral system affected turnout. Most results in this chapter contradict findings in research using cross-sectional data.

Key concepts: Electoral system, Turnout, Electoral reform, Voter turnout, Transformative learning, Proportional representation, Political science, Representation (politics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessing Effects of Reforms: Changing the Electoral System — Research Paper | ScholarLens