2012•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Germany — Safeguarding the Family

Irène Eulriet

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The dispute over women’s military participation in Germany took on unrivalled proportions. The decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) regarding the Kreil case launched a remarkable series of debates in Parliament, particularly in the Bundestag.1 Contrary to the French case, material is therefore abundant. This is partly linked to decision-making processes, namely to the outstanding role of Parliament in the defence and security sector. In addition to the fact that the Bundeswehr has been deemed a Parlamentsheer (parliamentary troop) since 1994,2 the German Parliament is one which has a unique input in all decisions in the field (Eekelen, 2002). Its plenary assembly, its Verteidigungsausschuss (Committee on Defence),3 as well as the distinctive institution of the Wehrbeauftragter (Parliamentary Delegate for Defence)4 are key instruments by which civilian, hence parliamentary oversight is effectively operated over the executive’s action. The material to be examined in this chapter is therefore chiefly constituted of the proceedings of the numerous discussions which took place in the Bundestag over the two legislative periods from 1998 to 2005 (though documentation from the previous or consecutive legislative periods will be considered too).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The dispute over women’s military participation in Germany took on unrivalled proportions. The decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) regarding the Kreil case launched a remarkable series of debates in Parliament, particularly in the Bundestag.1 Contrary to the French case, material is therefore abundant. This is partly linked to decision-making processes, namely to the outstanding role of Parliament in the defence and security sector. In addition to the fact that the Bundeswehr has been deemed a Parlamentsheer (parliamentary troop) since 1994,2 the German Parliament is one which has a unique input in all decisions in the field (Eekelen, 2002). Its plenary assembly, its Verteidigungsausschuss (Committee on Defence),3 as well as the distinctive institution of the Wehrbeauftragter (Parliamentary Delegate for Defence)4 are key instruments by which civilian, hence parliamentary oversight is effectively operated over the executive’s action. The material to be examined in this chapter is therefore chiefly constituted of the proceedings of the numerous discussions which took place in the Bundestag over the two legislative periods from 1998 to 2005 (though documentation from the previous or consecutive legislative periods will be considered too).

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The dispute over women’s military participation in Germany took on unrivalled proportions. The decision of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) regarding the Kreil case launched a remarkable series of debates in Parliament, particularly in the Bundestag.1 Contrary to the French case, material is therefore abundant. This is partly linked to decision-making processes, namely to the outstanding role of Parliament in the defence and security sector. In addition to the fact that the Bundeswehr has been deemed a Parlamentsheer (parliamentary troop) since 1994,2 the German Parliament is one which has a unique input in all decisions in the field (Eekelen, 2002). Its plenary assembly, its Verteidigungsausschuss (Committee on Defence),3 as well as the distinctive institution of the Wehrbeauftragter (Parliamentary Delegate for Defence)4 are key instruments by which civilian, hence parliamentary oversight is effectively operated over the executive’s action. The material to be examined in this chapter is therefore chiefly constituted of the proceedings of the numerous discussions which took place in the Bundestag over the two legislative periods from 1998 to 2005 (though documentation from the previous or consecutive legislative periods will be considered too).

Key concepts: Parliament, Political science, Delegate, Legislature, Safeguarding, Law, German, Public administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Germany — Safeguarding the Family — Research Paper | ScholarLens