2005Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

DAMAGES, EXCUSE, AND PRESERVATION

Larry A. DiMatteo, Lucien J. Dhooge, Stephanie M. Greene, Virginia G. Maurer, Marisa Anne Pagnattaro

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Upon breach by either party, a number of consequences result that are common to buyers and sellers. The CISG provides a series of procedures that impact the consequences of breach. First, it provides rules for the calculation of damages. Second, it provides a number of limiting doctrines that may be used to reduce the amount of damages awarded. Third, it provides the excuse of impediment that allows the breaching party to avoid damages. Fourth, it provides rules for the consequences of contractual avoidance. Finally, it allocates certain obligations pertaining to the preservation of goods. CALCULATION OF DAMAGES: ARTICLES 75 AND 76 Articles 74, 75, and 76 set out general formulas for the calculation of damages. Pursuant to Article 74, damages consist of a sum equal to the loss, including loss of profit, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the breach. Under Article 75, if the contract is avoided, and the buyer has bought goods in replacement or the seller has resold the goods, the party claiming damages may recover “the difference between the contract price and the price in the substitute transaction.” The substitute transaction must be made in a reasonable manner and within a reasonable time after avoidance. If the substitute transaction occurs in a different place from the original transaction or is on different terms, the amount of damages must be adjusted to recognize any increase in costs, less any expenses saved as a consequence of the breach.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Upon breach by either party, a number of consequences result that are common to buyers and sellers. The CISG provides a series of procedures that impact the consequences of breach. First, it provides rules for the calculation of damages. Second, it provides a number of limiting doctrines that may be used to reduce the amount of damages awarded. Third, it provides the excuse of impediment that allows the breaching party to avoid damages. Fourth, it provides rules for the consequences of contractual avoidance. Finally, it allocates certain obligations pertaining to the preservation of goods. CALCULATION OF DAMAGES: ARTICLES 75 AND 76 Articles 74, 75, and 76 set out general formulas for the calculation of damages. Pursuant to Article 74, damages consist of a sum equal to the loss, including loss of profit, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the breach. Under Article 75, if the contract is avoided, and the buyer has bought goods in replacement or the seller has resold the goods, the party claiming damages may recover “the difference between the contract price and the price in the substitute transaction.” The substitute transaction must be made in a reasonable manner and within a reasonable time after avoidance. If the substitute transaction occurs in a different place from the original transaction or is on different terms, the amount of damages must be adjusted to recognize any increase in costs, less any expenses saved as a consequence of the breach.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Upon breach by either party, a number of consequences result that are common to buyers and sellers. The CISG provides a series of procedures that impact the consequences of breach. First, it provides rules for the calculation of damages. Second, it provides a number of limiting doctrines that may be used to reduce the amount of damages awarded. Third, it provides the excuse of impediment that allows the breaching party to avoid damages. Fourth, it provides rules for the consequences of contractual avoidance. Finally, it allocates certain obligations pertaining to the preservation of goods. CALCULATION OF DAMAGES: ARTICLES 75 AND 76 Articles 74, 75, and 76 set out general formulas for the calculation of damages. Pursuant to Article 74, damages consist of a sum equal to the loss, including loss of profit, suffered by the other party as a consequence of the breach. Under Article 75, if the contract is avoided, and the buyer has bought goods in replacement or the seller has resold the goods, the party claiming damages may recover “the difference between the contract price and the price in the substitute transaction.” The substitute transaction must be made in a reasonable manner and within a reasonable time after avoidance. If the substitute transaction occurs in a different place from the original transaction or is on different terms, the amount of damages must be adjusted to recognize any increase in costs, less any expenses saved as a consequence of the breach.

Key concepts: Excuse, Damages, Limiting, Business, Law and economics, Law, Economics, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
DAMAGES, EXCUSE, AND PRESERVATION — Research Paper | ScholarLens