2015•Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Discursive Psychology Uncut

Ian Parker

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

The terms ‘discourse’ and ‘discourse analysis’ often present problems for researchers from a psychology background coming across them for the first time. This is because the terms do not have an easily understood everyday meaning in the way that ‘personality’ or ‘development’ do. This is both a strength and a weakness for critical psychologists, as we shall see. The terms also present problems because many ‘introductions to discourse analysis’ describe discourse from a linguistic or sociological point of view. We can then lose sight of the distinctive critical contribution of a discursive approach to this discipline. There are, in addition, strong disagreements amongst discourse analysts as to what it is they are actually studying and how they should study it. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The terms ‘discourse’ and ‘discourse analysis’ often present problems for researchers from a psychology background coming across them for the first time. This is because the terms do not have an easily understood everyday meaning in the way that ‘personality’ or ‘development’ do. This is both a strength and a weakness for critical psychologists, as we shall see. The terms also present problems because many ‘introductions to discourse analysis’ describe discourse from a linguistic or sociological point of view. We can then lose sight of the distinctive critical contribution of a discursive approach to this discipline. There are, in addition, strong disagreements amongst discourse analysts as to what it is they are actually studying and how they should study it. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The terms ‘discourse’ and ‘discourse analysis’ often present problems for researchers from a psychology background coming across them for the first time. This is because the terms do not have an easily understood everyday meaning in the way that ‘personality’ or ‘development’ do. This is both a strength and a weakness for critical psychologists, as we shall see. The terms also present problems because many ‘introductions to discourse analysis’ describe discourse from a linguistic or sociological point of view. We can then lose sight of the distinctive critical contribution of a discursive approach to this discipline. There are, in addition, strong disagreements amongst discourse analysts as to what it is they are actually studying and how they should study it. These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Key concepts: Meaning (existential), Sociology, Epistemology, Discourse analysis, Point (geometry), Civil discourse, Personality, Critical discourse analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Discursive Psychology Uncut — Research Paper | ScholarLens