Philosophy as Education
Stanley Cavell
Abstract
Stanley Cavell
Abstract
The coda provided by Cavell's short paper “Philosophy as Education” echoes themes that run through this collection. If philosophical problems are solved by rearranging or putting together again what we have always known, this will sometimes be a matter of remembering what we have forgotten. This will perforce include what we have forgotten as a result of denials that prevail in the sometimes oppressive institutions of contemporary education. Overcoming such forms of denial will not be a matter of acquiring new facts, and it will not be well described in terms of natural growth; rather, it will require a kind of conversion, for this will be a condition of the autonomy of the grownup. It is reference not just to Wittgenstein and Augustine but to Thoreau that leads Cavell back to thoughts of America and specifically to the thought that the public language of America is inadequate to the promise that is implied in its name. Finally, there is the thought that philosophy, as realized in Wittgenstein at least, requires the kind of self-criticism that moves the education of grownups.
OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The coda provided by Cavell's short paper “Philosophy as Education” echoes themes that run through this collection. If philosophical problems are solved by rearranging or putting together again what we have always known, this will sometimes be a matter of remembering what we have forgotten. This will perforce include what we have forgotten as a result of denials that prevail in the sometimes oppressive institutions of contemporary education. Overcoming such forms of denial will not be a matter of acquiring new facts, and it will not be well described in terms of natural growth; rather, it will require a kind of conversion, for this will be a condition of the autonomy of the grownup. It is reference not just to Wittgenstein and Augustine but to Thoreau that leads Cavell back to thoughts of America and specifically to the thought that the public language of America is inadequate to the promise that is implied in its name. Finally, there is the thought that philosophy, as realized in Wittgenstein at least, requires the kind of self-criticism that moves the education of grownups.
Key concepts: Autonomy, Denial, Criticism, Epistemology, Natural (archaeology), Philosophy, Law, Psychology