2015Oxford University Press eBooksRequires access

Independence of the Judiciary

Abhinav Chandrachud

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to determine whether the Bombay High Court functioned independently of the other branches of government in the colonial era. We will see that the nature of relations between the executive government and the High Court in colonial Bombay were strained, even though the High Court was not meant to play the policing role of Crown courts under the East India Company regime. We will see that colonial courts in Bombay decided criminal cases quite independently of the other branches of government, and that the average criminal conviction rate was a modest 50 per cent. However, we will also see that important and sensational political cases, usually involving sedition, were typically decided by the High Court in favour of the government.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The aim of this chapter is to determine whether the Bombay High Court functioned independently of the other branches of government in the colonial era. We will see that the nature of relations between the executive government and the High Court in colonial Bombay were strained, even though the High Court was not meant to play the policing role of Crown courts under the East India Company regime. We will see that colonial courts in Bombay decided criminal cases quite independently of the other branches of government, and that the average criminal conviction rate was a modest 50 per cent. However, we will also see that important and sensational political cases, usually involving sedition, were typically decided by the High Court in favour of the government.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The aim of this chapter is to determine whether the Bombay High Court functioned independently of the other branches of government in the colonial era. We will see that the nature of relations between the executive government and the High Court in colonial Bombay were strained, even though the High Court was not meant to play the policing role of Crown courts under the East India Company regime. We will see that colonial courts in Bombay decided criminal cases quite independently of the other branches of government, and that the average criminal conviction rate was a modest 50 per cent. However, we will also see that important and sensational political cases, usually involving sedition, were typically decided by the High Court in favour of the government.

Key concepts: Independence (probability theory), Political science, Psychology, Law and economics, Economics, Mathematics, Statistics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Independence of the Judiciary — Research Paper | ScholarLens