2015Winchester Research RepositoryRequires access

Critical Education Studies.

Simon Boxley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Education Studies as an academic discipline within HE in the UK is a contested area. One thing most Education Studies programmes might agree on is that they are 'critical'. But what is a genuinely critical Education Studies degree? And, how could such a programme survive within the hostile neoliberal environment of the contemporary UK? This chapter argues from a materialist perspective that Education Studies which are critical entail the responsibility on the part of students and staff to put theory to work in their lives, and to provide the conditions for students to work on the production of their own capacity to labour. This represents a setting on its feet of the Hegelian model of Education Studies proposed by Tubbs and Grimes (2001). In order for Education Studies to remain critical, it is argued that something of its learning and teaching must remain covert, to operate within the interstices of bourgeois social structures.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Education Studies as an academic discipline within HE in the UK is a contested area. One thing most Education Studies programmes might agree on is that they are 'critical'. But what is a genuinely critical Education Studies degree? And, how could such a programme survive within the hostile neoliberal environment of the contemporary UK? This chapter argues from a materialist perspective that Education Studies which are critical entail the responsibility on the part of students and staff to put theory to work in their lives, and to provide the conditions for students to work on the production of their own capacity to labour. This represents a setting on its feet of the Hegelian model of Education Studies proposed by Tubbs and Grimes (2001). In order for Education Studies to remain critical, it is argued that something of its learning and teaching must remain covert, to operate within the interstices of bourgeois social structures.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Education Studies as an academic discipline within HE in the UK is a contested area. One thing most Education Studies programmes might agree on is that they are 'critical'. But what is a genuinely critical Education Studies degree? And, how could such a programme survive within the hostile neoliberal environment of the contemporary UK? This chapter argues from a materialist perspective that Education Studies which are critical entail the responsibility on the part of students and staff to put theory to work in their lives, and to provide the conditions for students to work on the production of their own capacity to labour. This represents a setting on its feet of the Hegelian model of Education Studies proposed by Tubbs and Grimes (2001). In order for Education Studies to remain critical, it is argued that something of its learning and teaching must remain covert, to operate within the interstices of bourgeois social structures.

Key concepts: Critical theory, Covert, Sociology, Materialism, Neoliberalism (international relations), Hegelianism, Higher education, Historical materialism

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Critical Education Studies. — Research Paper | ScholarLens