1982PubMedRequires access

Comparison of the efficacy of propafenone versus disopyramide for complex premature ventricular contractions. Evaluation with long-term monitoring.

Franco F. Naccarella, Massimo Palmieri, P Del Corso, G Lombardi, Daniele Bracchetti

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Interpreting the results of this study, propafenone (Rytmonorm), administered orally in a dose of 900 mg daily, was more effective than disopyramide in a dose of 600 mg daily, in the treatment of patients with complex premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The study was performed in 12 patients, with several Holter ECG monitorings to obtain quantitative data of the effectiveness in the same patient of the new drug propafenone in comparison with disopyramide in a documented effective oral regimen. A quantitative analysis of PVCs was obtained with a computer assisted detection. Clinical effectiveness, considered as 70--80% reduction of total number of PVCs, was obtained in 8/12 patients for propafenone and 6/12 for disopyramide, or as 50% reduction with suppression of all complex PVCs (couplets, repetitive, multiform and bigeminy) was obtained in 11/12 for propafenone and 9/12 for disopyramide.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Interpreting the results of this study, propafenone (Rytmonorm), administered orally in a dose of 900 mg daily, was more effective than disopyramide in a dose of 600 mg daily, in the treatment of patients with complex premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The study was performed in 12 patients, with several Holter ECG monitorings to obtain quantitative data of the effectiveness in the same patient of the new drug propafenone in comparison with disopyramide in a documented effective oral regimen. A quantitative analysis of PVCs was obtained with a computer assisted detection. Clinical effectiveness, considered as 70--80% reduction of total number of PVCs, was obtained in 8/12 patients for propafenone and 6/12 for disopyramide, or as 50% reduction with suppression of all complex PVCs (couplets, repetitive, multiform and bigeminy) was obtained in 11/12 for propafenone and 9/12 for disopyramide.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Interpreting the results of this study, propafenone (Rytmonorm), administered orally in a dose of 900 mg daily, was more effective than disopyramide in a dose of 600 mg daily, in the treatment of patients with complex premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). The study was performed in 12 patients, with several Holter ECG monitorings to obtain quantitative data of the effectiveness in the same patient of the new drug propafenone in comparison with disopyramide in a documented effective oral regimen. A quantitative analysis of PVCs was obtained with a computer assisted detection. Clinical effectiveness, considered as 70--80% reduction of total number of PVCs, was obtained in 8/12 patients for propafenone and 6/12 for disopyramide, or as 50% reduction with suppression of all complex PVCs (couplets, repetitive, multiform and bigeminy) was obtained in 11/12 for propafenone and 9/12 for disopyramide.

Key concepts: Disopyramide, Propafenone, Bigeminy, Medicine, Internal medicine, Cardiology, Anesthesia, Atrial fibrillation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the efficacy of propafenone versus disopyramide for complex premature ventricular contractions. Evaluation with long-term monitoring. — Research Paper | ScholarLens