1989PubMedRequires access

[Rigid and flexible ureteroscopy. Apropos of 200 consecutive cases].

THIERRY A. FLAM, Marc Zerbib, A Steg

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

191 patients underwent a total of 200 ureteroscopies. Indications for these were as follows: ureter stones (172 cases); ureteral anomalies undiagnosed by other methods (20 cases); therapeutic ureteroscopy (8 cases). Stones: ureteroscopy for stones was carried out using either a rigid instrument (156 cases) or a flexible ureteroscope (16 cases). The localization of the stones was pelvic (123 cases), iliac (18 cases) or lumbar (10 cases). The stones were either removed directly using the basket under visual control (74/139 cases), or removed by ultrasonic/laser fragmentation (65/139 cases). As regards the rigid ureteroscope, success rates were 89% (139/156); 15 patients required additional therapy. Repeated ureteroscopic interventions always provided positive results. As concerns flexible ureteroscopy, we only had one positive result; 15 failure cases warranted repeated additional treatments. In three instances, failure with flexible ureteroscopy was corrected by using the rigid device during the same surgical period. We observed a single case of major complication in this series, i.e., a laterovesical urinoma which necessitated surgical drainage and was linked to the lack of ureteral drainage following ureteroscopy. Diagnostic ureteroscopic examinations: in 20 instances, ureteroscopy allowed to diagnose with precision the ureteral abnormality. No complication was reported following diagnostic ureteroscopy. Therapeutic ureteroscopy: such interventions were carried out to introduce a guide into the renal cavities (3 cases); to remove a double J stent, the lower extremity of which had moved up into the ureter (3 cases); or to carry out endoscopic ureterotomy (2 cases). Ureteroscopy is a safe and reliable method for the treatment of ureteral stones, and more particularly of stones localized in the distal part of the ureter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

191 patients underwent a total of 200 ureteroscopies. Indications for these were as follows: ureter stones (172 cases); ureteral anomalies undiagnosed by other methods (20 cases); therapeutic ureteroscopy (8 cases). Stones: ureteroscopy for stones was carried out using either a rigid instrument (156 cases) or a flexible ureteroscope (16 cases). The localization of the stones was pelvic (123 cases), iliac (18 cases) or lumbar (10 cases). The stones were either removed directly using the basket under visual control (74/139 cases), or removed by ultrasonic/laser fragmentation (65/139 cases). As regards the rigid ureteroscope, success rates were 89% (139/156); 15 patients required additional therapy. Repeated ureteroscopic interventions always provided positive results. As concerns flexible ureteroscopy, we only had one positive result; 15 failure cases warranted repeated additional treatments. In three instances, failure with flexible ureteroscopy was corrected by using the rigid device during the same surgical period. We observed a single case of major complication in this series, i.e., a laterovesical urinoma which necessitated surgical drainage and was linked to the lack of ureteral drainage following ureteroscopy. Diagnostic ureteroscopic examinations: in 20 instances, ureteroscopy allowed to diagnose with precision the ureteral abnormality. No complication was reported following diagnostic ureteroscopy. Therapeutic ureteroscopy: such interventions were carried out to introduce a guide into the renal cavities (3 cases); to remove a double J stent, the lower extremity of which had moved up into the ureter (3 cases); or to carry out endoscopic ureterotomy (2 cases). Ureteroscopy is a safe and reliable method for the treatment of ureteral stones, and more particularly of stones localized in the distal part of the ureter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

191 patients underwent a total of 200 ureteroscopies. Indications for these were as follows: ureter stones (172 cases); ureteral anomalies undiagnosed by other methods (20 cases); therapeutic ureteroscopy (8 cases). Stones: ureteroscopy for stones was carried out using either a rigid instrument (156 cases) or a flexible ureteroscope (16 cases). The localization of the stones was pelvic (123 cases), iliac (18 cases) or lumbar (10 cases). The stones were either removed directly using the basket under visual control (74/139 cases), or removed by ultrasonic/laser fragmentation (65/139 cases). As regards the rigid ureteroscope, success rates were 89% (139/156); 15 patients required additional therapy. Repeated ureteroscopic interventions always provided positive results. As concerns flexible ureteroscopy, we only had one positive result; 15 failure cases warranted repeated additional treatments. In three instances, failure with flexible ureteroscopy was corrected by using the rigid device during the same surgical period. We observed a single case of major complication in this series, i.e., a laterovesical urinoma which necessitated surgical drainage and was linked to the lack of ureteral drainage following ureteroscopy. Diagnostic ureteroscopic examinations: in 20 instances, ureteroscopy allowed to diagnose with precision the ureteral abnormality. No complication was reported following diagnostic ureteroscopy. Therapeutic ureteroscopy: such interventions were carried out to introduce a guide into the renal cavities (3 cases); to remove a double J stent, the lower extremity of which had moved up into the ureter (3 cases); or to carry out endoscopic ureterotomy (2 cases). Ureteroscopy is a safe and reliable method for the treatment of ureteral stones, and more particularly of stones localized in the distal part of the ureter.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Ureteroscopy, Medicine, Ureter, Surgery, Urinoma, Complication, Endoscopy, Urinary system

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Rigid and flexible ureteroscopy. Apropos of 200 consecutive cases]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens