The diagnosis of gallstones--a prospective comparison of oral cholecystography and real-time ultrasound.
H. Boutkan, Butzelaar Rm, Graham C. Davies
Abstract
H. Boutkan, Butzelaar Rm, Graham C. Davies
Abstract
A prospective study was made to compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound and oral cholecystography. 256 Patients were examined, 143 of whom were operated on. Ultrasound proved to have less chance of missing gallstones, whereas oral cholecystography showed a high percentage of false-positive results at first examination. Ultrasound is recommended as the method of choice for screening gallstones.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A prospective study was made to compare the diagnostic value of ultrasound and oral cholecystography. 256 Patients were examined, 143 of whom were operated on. Ultrasound proved to have less chance of missing gallstones, whereas oral cholecystography showed a high percentage of false-positive results at first examination. Ultrasound is recommended as the method of choice for screening gallstones.
Key concepts: Cholecystography, Medicine, Gallstones, Ultrasound, Prospective cohort study, Radiology, General surgery, Gastroenterology