[Epidural cooling for thoracoabdominal aortic surgery].
Koichi Nakazawa, Satoshi Tohyama, Akio Masuda, Masako Kawatani, Yoshie Masuzawa, Koshi Makita
Abstract
Koichi Nakazawa, Satoshi Tohyama, Akio Masuda, Masako Kawatani, Yoshie Masuzawa, Koshi Makita
Abstract
This report summarizes our experience with the use of epidural cooling for protecting spinal cord ischemic injury in patients receiving thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Of 8 cases with thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, we used epidural cooling in 5 cases. Epidural cooling was performed through an epidural catheter placed at Th 11 x 12 using chilled saline. Spinal cord temperature was maintained at approximately 28 degrees C. None of the 5 cases had paraplegia or paraparesis whereas two of 3 cases without epidural cooling had permanent paraplegia. In one case with paraplegia, we could not detect any changes in spinal evoked potential until the end of graft anastomosis. We monitored motor evoked potential in the recent 2 cases. We believe that epidural cooling combined with motor evoked potential monitoring appears to be a satisfactory strategy for preventing ischemic spinal cord injury in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This report summarizes our experience with the use of epidural cooling for protecting spinal cord ischemic injury in patients receiving thoracoabdominal aortic surgery. Of 8 cases with thoracoabdominal aortic surgery, we used epidural cooling in 5 cases. Epidural cooling was performed through an epidural catheter placed at Th 11 x 12 using chilled saline. Spinal cord temperature was maintained at approximately 28 degrees C. None of the 5 cases had paraplegia or paraparesis whereas two of 3 cases without epidural cooling had permanent paraplegia. In one case with paraplegia, we could not detect any changes in spinal evoked potential until the end of graft anastomosis. We monitored motor evoked potential in the recent 2 cases. We believe that epidural cooling combined with motor evoked potential monitoring appears to be a satisfactory strategy for preventing ischemic spinal cord injury in thoracoabdominal aortic surgery.
Key concepts: Paraplegia, Medicine, Aortic surgery, Spinal cord, Surgery, Anesthesia, Spinal cord injury, Catheter