1987Annales Zoologici FenniciRequires access

The spatial consequences of interspecific competition

Edward F. Connor, Michael A. Bowers

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

of plant and animal species. Spatial effects may be present at the scale of one or two habitats, at a regional scale, or at the scale of the entire geographical ranges of one or more species. If interspecific competition has affected or does affect the spatial distribution of organisms then it should be manifested at all spatial scales in repulsed interspecific distribution. We review the methods used and results obtained thus far in studies of the spatial consequences of interspecific competition at all spatial scales. We find that spatial effects occur more frequently and are logistically easier to detect at the scale of habitats than at larger spatial scales. Those instances where spatial effects have been documented usually involve interference competition. These instances are dominated by vertebrates, social in sects, or other organisms that are essentially sessile or at least occupy feeding or breeding territories for part of their life.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

of plant and animal species. Spatial effects may be present at the scale of one or two habitats, at a regional scale, or at the scale of the entire geographical ranges of one or more species. If interspecific competition has affected or does affect the spatial distribution of organisms then it should be manifested at all spatial scales in repulsed interspecific distribution. We review the methods used and results obtained thus far in studies of the spatial consequences of interspecific competition at all spatial scales. We find that spatial effects occur more frequently and are logistically easier to detect at the scale of habitats than at larger spatial scales. Those instances where spatial effects have been documented usually involve interference competition. These instances are dominated by vertebrates, social in sects, or other organisms that are essentially sessile or at least occupy feeding or breeding territories for part of their life.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

of plant and animal species. Spatial effects may be present at the scale of one or two habitats, at a regional scale, or at the scale of the entire geographical ranges of one or more species. If interspecific competition has affected or does affect the spatial distribution of organisms then it should be manifested at all spatial scales in repulsed interspecific distribution. We review the methods used and results obtained thus far in studies of the spatial consequences of interspecific competition at all spatial scales. We find that spatial effects occur more frequently and are logistically easier to detect at the scale of habitats than at larger spatial scales. Those instances where spatial effects have been documented usually involve interference competition. These instances are dominated by vertebrates, social in sects, or other organisms that are essentially sessile or at least occupy feeding or breeding territories for part of their life.

Key concepts: Interspecific competition, Spatial distribution, Spatial ecology, Competition (biology), Ecology, Habitat, Scale (ratio), Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The spatial consequences of interspecific competition — Research Paper | ScholarLens