2015•PubMedRequires access

Rationale for caries inhibition of debonded glass ionomer sealants: an in vitro study.

Natalie K. Smith, Kirk T Morris, Martha H Wells, Daranee Tantbirojn, Antheunis Versluis

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to test the hypothesis that, after glass ionomer (GI) sealant debonding, remaining GI in the deepest parts of fissures and/or the inhibition of enamel demineralization after artificial caries challenge imparts the residual cariostatic property observed in clinical studies. METHODS: Fuji IX GI sealant was placed on one tooth from 14 matched pairs of noncarious extracted human permanent molars and premolars; the other tooth was the control. Sealed teeth underwent thermocycling (4,000 cycles), and the sealant was manually debonded. The amount of remaining sealant in the fissures was determined using a stereomicroscope. All teeth were placed in lactic acid gel (pH 5.0) at 37 degrees Celsius for three weeks to simulate caries formation. The extent of demineralization was determined using the serial micro-hardness method on the cross-sectioned specimens at 0.5 mm from the depth of the central fissure. RESULTS: All teeth had GI retained in the fissures at a microscopic level. Enamel demineralization adjacent to the remaining GI was not significantly different from the control (t test; P=.88). CONCLUSIONS: The residual cariostatic property of glass ionomer sealant is most likely due to a physical barrier of remaining GI in the fissures rather than a chemical effect on demineralization inhibition.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to test the hypothesis that, after glass ionomer (GI) sealant debonding, remaining GI in the deepest parts of fissures and/or the inhibition of enamel demineralization after artificial caries challenge imparts the residual cariostatic property observed in clinical studies. METHODS: Fuji IX GI sealant was placed on one tooth from 14 matched pairs of noncarious extracted human permanent molars and premolars; the other tooth was the control. Sealed teeth underwent thermocycling (4,000 cycles), and the sealant was manually debonded. The amount of remaining sealant in the fissures was determined using a stereomicroscope. All teeth were placed in lactic acid gel (pH 5.0) at 37 degrees Celsius for three weeks to simulate caries formation. The extent of demineralization was determined using the serial micro-hardness method on the cross-sectioned specimens at 0.5 mm from the depth of the central fissure. RESULTS: All teeth had GI retained in the fissures at a microscopic level. Enamel demineralization adjacent to the remaining GI was not significantly different from the control (t test; P=.88). CONCLUSIONS: The residual cariostatic property of glass ionomer sealant is most likely due to a physical barrier of remaining GI in the fissures rather than a chemical effect on demineralization inhibition.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: This study's purpose was to test the hypothesis that, after glass ionomer (GI) sealant debonding, remaining GI in the deepest parts of fissures and/or the inhibition of enamel demineralization after artificial caries challenge imparts the residual cariostatic property observed in clinical studies. METHODS: Fuji IX GI sealant was placed on one tooth from 14 matched pairs of noncarious extracted human permanent molars and premolars; the other tooth was the control. Sealed teeth underwent thermocycling (4,000 cycles), and the sealant was manually debonded. The amount of remaining sealant in the fissures was determined using a stereomicroscope. All teeth were placed in lactic acid gel (pH 5.0) at 37 degrees Celsius for three weeks to simulate caries formation. The extent of demineralization was determined using the serial micro-hardness method on the cross-sectioned specimens at 0.5 mm from the depth of the central fissure. RESULTS: All teeth had GI retained in the fissures at a microscopic level. Enamel demineralization adjacent to the remaining GI was not significantly different from the control (t test; P=.88). CONCLUSIONS: The residual cariostatic property of glass ionomer sealant is most likely due to a physical barrier of remaining GI in the fissures rather than a chemical effect on demineralization inhibition.

Key concepts: Demineralization, Sealant, Glass ionomer cement, Enamel paint, Dentistry, Molar, Medicine, Stereo microscope

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Rationale for caries inhibition of debonded glass ionomer sealants: an in vitro study. — Research Paper | ScholarLens