2010•Unpublished venueRequires access

Credibility for Experience Rating, A Minimum Variance Approach

Lawrence F. Marcus

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This paper attempts to provide a relatively simple, but still mathematically meaningful context for applying Bühlmann credibility to large account experience rating. It further extends this to rating excess layers. It also allows for the inclusion of an additional complement of credibility to the traditional weighting of excess experience and ILF derived indications. Finally this paper gives guidance as to when exposure rating indications should not be used.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This paper attempts to provide a relatively simple, but still mathematically meaningful context for applying Bühlmann credibility to large account experience rating. It further extends this to rating excess layers. It also allows for the inclusion of an additional complement of credibility to the traditional weighting of excess experience and ILF derived indications. Finally this paper gives guidance as to when exposure rating indications should not be used.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This paper attempts to provide a relatively simple, but still mathematically meaningful context for applying Bühlmann credibility to large account experience rating. It further extends this to rating excess layers. It also allows for the inclusion of an additional complement of credibility to the traditional weighting of excess experience and ILF derived indications. Finally this paper gives guidance as to when exposure rating indications should not be used.

Key concepts: Credibility, Context (archaeology), Complement (music), Weighting, Variance (accounting), Computer science, Econometrics, Actuarial science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Credibility for Experience Rating, A Minimum Variance Approach — Research Paper | ScholarLens