Credibility for Experience Rating, A Minimum Variance Approach
Lawrence F. Marcus
Abstract
Lawrence F. Marcus
Abstract
This paper attempts to provide a relatively simple, but still mathematically meaningful context for applying Bühlmann credibility to large account experience rating. It further extends this to rating excess layers. It also allows for the inclusion of an additional complement of credibility to the traditional weighting of excess experience and ILF derived indications. Finally this paper gives guidance as to when exposure rating indications should not be used.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper attempts to provide a relatively simple, but still mathematically meaningful context for applying Bühlmann credibility to large account experience rating. It further extends this to rating excess layers. It also allows for the inclusion of an additional complement of credibility to the traditional weighting of excess experience and ILF derived indications. Finally this paper gives guidance as to when exposure rating indications should not be used.
Key concepts: Credibility, Context (archaeology), Complement (music), Weighting, Variance (accounting), Computer science, Econometrics, Actuarial science