[Results of three different stapedectomy techniques: a comparative study].
R Gómez-Ullate, F Cristóbal, J Gómez-Ullate, Patricia Monge Ortega, F Olaizola
Abstract
R Gómez-Ullate, F Cristóbal, J Gómez-Ullate, Patricia Monge Ortega, F Olaizola
Abstract
We perform a comparative study on the results obtained through three stapedectomy techniques. The hearing gain was evaluated in 107 ears with total footplate removal, Shea prosthesis and connective tissue graft, in 81 ears with particular footplate removal, the same prosthesis, and no tissue graft, and in 66 ears with stapedectomy. The differences between the three groups in the air-bone gap closure or postoperative complications were not statistically significant. We conclude that results depend more on the surgeon than on the technique.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We perform a comparative study on the results obtained through three stapedectomy techniques. The hearing gain was evaluated in 107 ears with total footplate removal, Shea prosthesis and connective tissue graft, in 81 ears with particular footplate removal, the same prosthesis, and no tissue graft, and in 66 ears with stapedectomy. The differences between the three groups in the air-bone gap closure or postoperative complications were not statistically significant. We conclude that results depend more on the surgeon than on the technique.
Key concepts: Footplate, Stapedectomy, Prosthesis, Medicine, Oval window, Stapes, Surgery, Dentistry