The Illogicality and Obscurity of the Economic Torts
Eng Beng Lee
Abstract
Eng Beng Lee
Abstract
Another cause of action relied on by the respondents against the appellant was the tort of conspiracy and it is this aspect of the decision which interests this commentator. [O]ne cannot help feeling slightly disappointed that an opportunity to rationalise or, at least, to highlight the difficult juridical foundations of the tort of conspiracy has been missed. The critical problem is the impossibility of true reconciliation of the tort of conspiracy by lawful means with the principle that a lawful act cannot become unlawful simply because it is actuated by malice, ill-will or, in the language of the tort, a predominant intention to injure.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Another cause of action relied on by the respondents against the appellant was the tort of conspiracy and it is this aspect of the decision which interests this commentator. [O]ne cannot help feeling slightly disappointed that an opportunity to rationalise or, at least, to highlight the difficult juridical foundations of the tort of conspiracy has been missed. The critical problem is the impossibility of true reconciliation of the tort of conspiracy by lawful means with the principle that a lawful act cannot become unlawful simply because it is actuated by malice, ill-will or, in the language of the tort, a predominant intention to injure.
Key concepts: Tort, Impossibility, Malice, Law, Action (physics), Publishing, Project commissioning, Cause of action