1997Singapore Academy of Law journalRequires access

The Illogicality and Obscurity of the Economic Torts

Eng Beng Lee

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Another cause of action relied on by the respondents against the appellant was the tort of conspiracy and it is this aspect of the decision which interests this commentator. [O]ne cannot help feeling slightly disappointed that an opportunity to rationalise or, at least, to highlight the difficult juridical foundations of the tort of conspiracy has been missed. The critical problem is the impossibility of true reconciliation of the tort of conspiracy by lawful means with the principle that a lawful act cannot become unlawful simply because it is actuated by malice, ill-will or, in the language of the tort, a predominant intention to injure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Another cause of action relied on by the respondents against the appellant was the tort of conspiracy and it is this aspect of the decision which interests this commentator. [O]ne cannot help feeling slightly disappointed that an opportunity to rationalise or, at least, to highlight the difficult juridical foundations of the tort of conspiracy has been missed. The critical problem is the impossibility of true reconciliation of the tort of conspiracy by lawful means with the principle that a lawful act cannot become unlawful simply because it is actuated by malice, ill-will or, in the language of the tort, a predominant intention to injure.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Another cause of action relied on by the respondents against the appellant was the tort of conspiracy and it is this aspect of the decision which interests this commentator. [O]ne cannot help feeling slightly disappointed that an opportunity to rationalise or, at least, to highlight the difficult juridical foundations of the tort of conspiracy has been missed. The critical problem is the impossibility of true reconciliation of the tort of conspiracy by lawful means with the principle that a lawful act cannot become unlawful simply because it is actuated by malice, ill-will or, in the language of the tort, a predominant intention to injure.

Key concepts: Tort, Impossibility, Malice, Law, Action (physics), Publishing, Project commissioning, Cause of action

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Illogicality and Obscurity of the Economic Torts — Research Paper | ScholarLens