2006Advances in respiratory medicineOpen access

The Role of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in the Diagnostic Algorithmof Solitary Pulmonary Nodule

Marta Dąbrowska, Rafał Krenke, Joanna Domagała‐Kulawik, Małgorzata Żukowska, Barbara Górnicka, Jerzy Bogdan, Ryszarda Chazan

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodule is controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of routine bronchoscopy performed in patients with peripheral lung nodule of 5-40 mm in diameter. From 60 patients with peripheral lung nodule, who underwent routine diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy between 2003 - 2005, we selected 36 patients in whom the final discrimination between malignant and benign tumor was achieved based on either pathological examination or radiological criteria (lack of growth within 2 years of radiological follow up). There were 22 (61%) patients with malignant tumor and 14 (39%) with benign nodule. All malignant tumors were lung carcinomas. In 10 of these patients we found macroscopic abnormalities during bronchoscopy and in 9 of them pathologic examination of specimens collected during the procedure could confirm malignant tissue. In two patients with benign lung nodule a second lung lesion (in different lung lobe) which proved to be lung cancer was identified during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules were 41%, 100%, and 64% respectively. Abandoning fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with peripheral lung nodules seems unjustified, although its limitations should be taken into account.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodule is controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of routine bronchoscopy performed in patients with peripheral lung nodule of 5-40 mm in diameter. From 60 patients with peripheral lung nodule, who underwent routine diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy between 2003 - 2005, we selected 36 patients in whom the final discrimination between malignant and benign tumor was achieved based on either pathological examination or radiological criteria (lack of growth within 2 years of radiological follow up). There were 22 (61%) patients with malignant tumor and 14 (39%) with benign nodule. All malignant tumors were lung carcinomas. In 10 of these patients we found macroscopic abnormalities during bronchoscopy and in 9 of them pathologic examination of specimens collected during the procedure could confirm malignant tissue. In two patients with benign lung nodule a second lung lesion (in different lung lobe) which proved to be lung cancer was identified during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules were 41%, 100%, and 64% respectively. Abandoning fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with peripheral lung nodules seems unjustified, although its limitations should be taken into account.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodule is controversial. The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of routine bronchoscopy performed in patients with peripheral lung nodule of 5-40 mm in diameter. From 60 patients with peripheral lung nodule, who underwent routine diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy between 2003 - 2005, we selected 36 patients in whom the final discrimination between malignant and benign tumor was achieved based on either pathological examination or radiological criteria (lack of growth within 2 years of radiological follow up). There were 22 (61%) patients with malignant tumor and 14 (39%) with benign nodule. All malignant tumors were lung carcinomas. In 10 of these patients we found macroscopic abnormalities during bronchoscopy and in 9 of them pathologic examination of specimens collected during the procedure could confirm malignant tissue. In two patients with benign lung nodule a second lung lesion (in different lung lobe) which proved to be lung cancer was identified during fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of peripheral lung nodules were 41%, 100%, and 64% respectively. Abandoning fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the diagnostic algorithm in patients with peripheral lung nodules seems unjustified, although its limitations should be taken into account.

Key concepts: Medicine, Bronchoscopy, Solitary pulmonary nodule, Radiology, Pulmonary medicine, Intensive care medicine, Computed tomography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Role of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in the Diagnostic Algorithmof Solitary Pulmonary Nodule — Research Paper | ScholarLens