2007•PubMedRequires access

Neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer--what can we accept?

Krdál, Č Neoral, R Aujeský, Roman Havlík, Jiri Klein, Marián Hajdúch, Hana Švébišová, Petr Beneš, Radek Vrba

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated neoadjuvant use in managing patients with esophageal carcinoma and its effects on the surgical resection and outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Patients prior to esophageal resection were offered the opportunity to receive a neoadjuvant cytostatic regimen (CDDP + FU, CDDP, or TAX + FU). Retrospective tumor chemoresistance analysis using the MTT test was also performed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were operated from 2001 until May 2004. A total of 55 resections were performed with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and 15 elected to only undergo surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. No deaths occurred as a result of surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, but complications included fistulas and hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the postoperative complications among the neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant groups. This therapy therefore does not have any influence on the course or results of surgical resection. MTT testing did not demonstrate any particular usefulness in tailoring neoadjuvant therapy. Chemoresistance could only be retrospectively evaluated and the results may be affected after cytostatic therapy. The long-term outcomes have not been evaluated yet due to the short follow-up time in our patient group.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated neoadjuvant use in managing patients with esophageal carcinoma and its effects on the surgical resection and outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Patients prior to esophageal resection were offered the opportunity to receive a neoadjuvant cytostatic regimen (CDDP + FU, CDDP, or TAX + FU). Retrospective tumor chemoresistance analysis using the MTT test was also performed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were operated from 2001 until May 2004. A total of 55 resections were performed with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and 15 elected to only undergo surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. No deaths occurred as a result of surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, but complications included fistulas and hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the postoperative complications among the neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant groups. This therapy therefore does not have any influence on the course or results of surgical resection. MTT testing did not demonstrate any particular usefulness in tailoring neoadjuvant therapy. Chemoresistance could only be retrospectively evaluated and the results may be affected after cytostatic therapy. The long-term outcomes have not been evaluated yet due to the short follow-up time in our patient group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: We evaluated neoadjuvant use in managing patients with esophageal carcinoma and its effects on the surgical resection and outcomes. METHODOLOGY: Patients prior to esophageal resection were offered the opportunity to receive a neoadjuvant cytostatic regimen (CDDP + FU, CDDP, or TAX + FU). Retrospective tumor chemoresistance analysis using the MTT test was also performed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were operated from 2001 until May 2004. A total of 55 resections were performed with preoperative neoadjuvant therapy and 15 elected to only undergo surgery without neoadjuvant therapy. No deaths occurred as a result of surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, but complications included fistulas and hemorrhages. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the postoperative complications among the neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant groups. This therapy therefore does not have any influence on the course or results of surgical resection. MTT testing did not demonstrate any particular usefulness in tailoring neoadjuvant therapy. Chemoresistance could only be retrospectively evaluated and the results may be affected after cytostatic therapy. The long-term outcomes have not been evaluated yet due to the short follow-up time in our patient group.

Key concepts: Neoadjuvant therapy, Medicine, Regimen, Esophageal cancer, Resection, Retrospective cohort study, Surgery, Oncology

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer--what can we accept? — Research Paper | ScholarLens