1995PubMedRequires access

Clinical evaluation of a new flossing device.

Jeffery J. Pucher, Poonam K Jayaprakash, T Aftyka, L Sigman, Van Swol R

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of a new flossing device, the Floss Plus easy flosser, in reducing interproximal plaque and interproximal gingival inflammation was compared to the effectiveness of hand-held floss. The first phase studied 36 dental students, while the second studied 26 adult patients undergoing supportive periodontal treatment. In both phases, the subjects were divided into two groups. One group used the flossing device, while the second group used hand-held floss. The Gingival Index and Plaque Index were taken at baseline, 1 week, and 6 weeks. All groups experienced a significant decrease in the amount of interproximal inflammation and plaque, regardless of which flossing method was used. There was no statistically significant difference between the two flossing methods in the reduction of interproximal inflammation or plaque. These results indicated that the Floss Plus easy flosser is as effective as hand-held floss in reducing interproximal plaque and gingivitis. The use of this aid may benefit those patients who lack the dexterity for hand-held floss or who find flossing cumbersome.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The clinical effectiveness of a new flossing device, the Floss Plus easy flosser, in reducing interproximal plaque and interproximal gingival inflammation was compared to the effectiveness of hand-held floss. The first phase studied 36 dental students, while the second studied 26 adult patients undergoing supportive periodontal treatment. In both phases, the subjects were divided into two groups. One group used the flossing device, while the second group used hand-held floss. The Gingival Index and Plaque Index were taken at baseline, 1 week, and 6 weeks. All groups experienced a significant decrease in the amount of interproximal inflammation and plaque, regardless of which flossing method was used. There was no statistically significant difference between the two flossing methods in the reduction of interproximal inflammation or plaque. These results indicated that the Floss Plus easy flosser is as effective as hand-held floss in reducing interproximal plaque and gingivitis. The use of this aid may benefit those patients who lack the dexterity for hand-held floss or who find flossing cumbersome.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The clinical effectiveness of a new flossing device, the Floss Plus easy flosser, in reducing interproximal plaque and interproximal gingival inflammation was compared to the effectiveness of hand-held floss. The first phase studied 36 dental students, while the second studied 26 adult patients undergoing supportive periodontal treatment. In both phases, the subjects were divided into two groups. One group used the flossing device, while the second group used hand-held floss. The Gingival Index and Plaque Index were taken at baseline, 1 week, and 6 weeks. All groups experienced a significant decrease in the amount of interproximal inflammation and plaque, regardless of which flossing method was used. There was no statistically significant difference between the two flossing methods in the reduction of interproximal inflammation or plaque. These results indicated that the Floss Plus easy flosser is as effective as hand-held floss in reducing interproximal plaque and gingivitis. The use of this aid may benefit those patients who lack the dexterity for hand-held floss or who find flossing cumbersome.

Key concepts: Dental floss, Medicine, Gingivitis, Gingival inflammation, Dentistry, Significant difference, Dental plaque, Orthodontics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Clinical evaluation of a new flossing device. — Research Paper | ScholarLens