1985Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooksRequires access

Efferent control of human muscle spindles

M. H. Gladden

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

It is usually assumed that muscle spindles function in essentially the same way in humans and cats. Indeed, there was disquiet when, on comparing afferent activity from spindles during voluntary movements in awake humans and cats, human spindles could not be made to behave like cat spindles (Hagbarth, 1981; Vallbo, 1981). Primary and secondary afferent activity during passive muscle stretching is similar in humans and cats (Poppele & Kennedy, 1974; Newsom Davis, 1975). The efferent supply of human spindles can be stimulated in intramuscular nerves while monitoring the movement of the intrafusal muscle fibres (Gladden et al., 1982) by using techniques developed to study the effects of fusimotor stimulation on cat intrafusal fibres in vitro (Boyd & Ward, 1975). The results suggest that human spindles have dynamic and static fusimotor axons which the central nervous system can activate independently.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It is usually assumed that muscle spindles function in essentially the same way in humans and cats. Indeed, there was disquiet when, on comparing afferent activity from spindles during voluntary movements in awake humans and cats, human spindles could not be made to behave like cat spindles (Hagbarth, 1981; Vallbo, 1981). Primary and secondary afferent activity during passive muscle stretching is similar in humans and cats (Poppele & Kennedy, 1974; Newsom Davis, 1975). The efferent supply of human spindles can be stimulated in intramuscular nerves while monitoring the movement of the intrafusal muscle fibres (Gladden et al., 1982) by using techniques developed to study the effects of fusimotor stimulation on cat intrafusal fibres in vitro (Boyd & Ward, 1975). The results suggest that human spindles have dynamic and static fusimotor axons which the central nervous system can activate independently.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It is usually assumed that muscle spindles function in essentially the same way in humans and cats. Indeed, there was disquiet when, on comparing afferent activity from spindles during voluntary movements in awake humans and cats, human spindles could not be made to behave like cat spindles (Hagbarth, 1981; Vallbo, 1981). Primary and secondary afferent activity during passive muscle stretching is similar in humans and cats (Poppele & Kennedy, 1974; Newsom Davis, 1975). The efferent supply of human spindles can be stimulated in intramuscular nerves while monitoring the movement of the intrafusal muscle fibres (Gladden et al., 1982) by using techniques developed to study the effects of fusimotor stimulation on cat intrafusal fibres in vitro (Boyd & Ward, 1975). The results suggest that human spindles have dynamic and static fusimotor axons which the central nervous system can activate independently.

Key concepts: Efferent, Afferent, CATS, Muscle spindle, Stimulation, Neuroscience, Anatomy, Human muscle

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efferent control of human muscle spindles — Research Paper | ScholarLens