2012NORA - Norwegian Open Research ArchivesOpen access

High speed rail : challenges for the high speed rail project in Norway

Vidar Ringstad

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

This Master Thesis has focus on parts of the public transport system in Norway. The main topic in this thesis is:\nWhat variables must be calculated for the decision concerning the construction and implementation of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project, and how are the variables calculated?\nHigh Speed Rail does not have a single standard definition. High Speed Rail definition, given in the European Union definition, Directive 96/48 is suitable for many different systems of rolling stock, infrastructure and operating.1\nNew lines shall be designed to guarantee safe uninterrupted travel at speed above 250 km/h on lines specially built for High Speed, while enable speeds of over 300 km/h to be reached in appropriate circumstances. Existing lines, which have been specially upgraded, shall be guaranteed a speed of 200 km/h. On other lines: Highest possible speed.2 Infrastructure of the Trans-European High Speed system shall be built especially for High Speed travel. Connecting lines may be included, in particular junctions of new lines, which is upgraded, for High Speed with stations located in town center, on which speeds must be adjusted to local conditions.3\nHigh Speed lines shall incorporate specially built lines prepared for speeds equal to or above 250 km/h and upgraded High Speed lines prepared for 200 km/h. Special features as a result of topographic, relief or town-planning constraints need to be adapted to each case on which the speed must change. High Speed train takes for granted that the characteristics of infrastructure and those of the rolling stock are compatible.4\nChallenges concerning costs and benefits, and budget deficit/surplus of the High Speed Rail projects in other countries (e.g. HS1 and HS2 in England, AVE in Spain, and High Speed Rail in California) will be empirical cases in this thesis, which all are influenced by political and technical challenges, which are relevant for the Norwegian High Speed Rail.\n1 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n2 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n3 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n4 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\nVI\nDuring the work with this specific topic, many elements have been taken account of but the demand uncertainty is probably the most critical and essential element of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project and is close related to a second variable; the passengers’ willingness to pay for high-speed rail.\nThe topics for this master thesis is of theoretical character and has no ambition to quantify the level of financial needs for construction costs and operating costs of the High Speed Rail project.\nProducing a cost-benefit analysis (which is a list of quantified benefits and costs associated with the project, expressed in monetary values, calculated ex ante), with a valid conclusion turned out to be far out of reach for this thesis. The evolvement of the thesis has been a process with changing criteria for commenting selected High Speed Rail projects. An example is the decision (January 2012) to build the HS2 project in England.5\nSome empirical cases from High Speed Rail projects bring interesting challenges to the surface. Even when the number of passenger in other countries with High Speed Rail are many times the number of passengers between regions around Norwegian urban areas, High Speed Rail projects will very seldom pay off. There will not be any conclusion in this thesis about which scenario to choose.\nThe number of passenger for each of the High Speed Rail projects in this thesis is too complicated to quantify. Aspirations for this thesis are therefore to focus on some of the challenges in these kinds of mega projects.\nThe conclusion is that timing of the construction and implementing of the High Speed Rail project is crucial for the result of the cost benefit analysis whether the Norwegian High Speed Rail project should be built or not. Timing influences all the variables of the cost benefit analysis in this thesis. Timing is therefore crucial for the result of the analyses. It’s beyond the limit of this thesis to conclude whether the increasing demand for transport caused by population growth in the regions around cities in Norway should be solved by building the High Speed Rail project or not.\nIt seems as the Norwegian High Speed Rail project is many decades too early for an efficient use of resources.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This Master Thesis has focus on parts of the public transport system in Norway. The main topic in this thesis is:\nWhat variables must be calculated for the decision concerning the construction and implementation of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project, and how are the variables calculated?\nHigh Speed Rail does not have a single standard definition. High Speed Rail definition, given in the European Union definition, Directive 96/48 is suitable for many different systems of rolling stock, infrastructure and operating.1\nNew lines shall be designed to guarantee safe uninterrupted travel at speed above 250 km/h on lines specially built for High Speed, while enable speeds of over 300 km/h to be reached in appropriate circumstances. Existing lines, which have been specially upgraded, shall be guaranteed a speed of 200 km/h. On other lines: Highest possible speed.2 Infrastructure of the Trans-European High Speed system shall be built especially for High Speed travel. Connecting lines may be included, in particular junctions of new lines, which is upgraded, for High Speed with stations located in town center, on which speeds must be adjusted to local conditions.3\nHigh Speed lines shall incorporate specially built lines prepared for speeds equal to or above 250 km/h and upgraded High Speed lines prepared for 200 km/h. Special features as a result of topographic, relief or town-planning constraints need to be adapted to each case on which the speed must change. High Speed train takes for granted that the characteristics of infrastructure and those of the rolling stock are compatible.4\nChallenges concerning costs and benefits, and budget deficit/surplus of the High Speed Rail projects in other countries (e.g. HS1 and HS2 in England, AVE in Spain, and High Speed Rail in California) will be empirical cases in this thesis, which all are influenced by political and technical challenges, which are relevant for the Norwegian High Speed Rail.\n1 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n2 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n3 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n4 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\nVI\nDuring the work with this specific topic, many elements have been taken account of but the demand uncertainty is probably the most critical and essential element of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project and is close related to a second variable; the passengers’ willingness to pay for high-speed rail.\nThe topics for this master thesis is of theoretical character and has no ambition to quantify the level of financial needs for construction costs and operating costs of the High Speed Rail project.\nProducing a cost-benefit analysis (which is a list of quantified benefits and costs associated with the project, expressed in monetary values, calculated ex ante), with a valid conclusion turned out to be far out of reach for this thesis. The evolvement of the thesis has been a process with changing criteria for commenting selected High Speed Rail projects. An example is the decision (January 2012) to build the HS2 project in England.5\nSome empirical cases from High Speed Rail projects bring interesting challenges to the surface. Even when the number of passenger in other countries with High Speed Rail are many times the number of passengers between regions around Norwegian urban areas, High Speed Rail projects will very seldom pay off. There will not be any conclusion in this thesis about which scenario to choose.\nThe number of passenger for each of the High Speed Rail projects in this thesis is too complicated to quantify. Aspirations for this thesis are therefore to focus on some of the challenges in these kinds of mega projects.\nThe conclusion is that timing of the construction and implementing of the High Speed Rail project is crucial for the result of the cost benefit analysis whether the Norwegian High Speed Rail project should be built or not. Timing influences all the variables of the cost benefit analysis in this thesis. Timing is therefore crucial for the result of the analyses. It’s beyond the limit of this thesis to conclude whether the increasing demand for transport caused by population growth in the regions around cities in Norway should be solved by building the High Speed Rail project or not.\nIt seems as the Norwegian High Speed Rail project is many decades too early for an efficient use of resources.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This Master Thesis has focus on parts of the public transport system in Norway. The main topic in this thesis is:\nWhat variables must be calculated for the decision concerning the construction and implementation of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project, and how are the variables calculated?\nHigh Speed Rail does not have a single standard definition. High Speed Rail definition, given in the European Union definition, Directive 96/48 is suitable for many different systems of rolling stock, infrastructure and operating.1\nNew lines shall be designed to guarantee safe uninterrupted travel at speed above 250 km/h on lines specially built for High Speed, while enable speeds of over 300 km/h to be reached in appropriate circumstances. Existing lines, which have been specially upgraded, shall be guaranteed a speed of 200 km/h. On other lines: Highest possible speed.2 Infrastructure of the Trans-European High Speed system shall be built especially for High Speed travel. Connecting lines may be included, in particular junctions of new lines, which is upgraded, for High Speed with stations located in town center, on which speeds must be adjusted to local conditions.3\nHigh Speed lines shall incorporate specially built lines prepared for speeds equal to or above 250 km/h and upgraded High Speed lines prepared for 200 km/h. Special features as a result of topographic, relief or town-planning constraints need to be adapted to each case on which the speed must change. High Speed train takes for granted that the characteristics of infrastructure and those of the rolling stock are compatible.4\nChallenges concerning costs and benefits, and budget deficit/surplus of the High Speed Rail projects in other countries (e.g. HS1 and HS2 in England, AVE in Spain, and High Speed Rail in California) will be empirical cases in this thesis, which all are influenced by political and technical challenges, which are relevant for the Norwegian High Speed Rail.\n1 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n2 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n3 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\n4 International Union of Railways (2010) p. 1\nVI\nDuring the work with this specific topic, many elements have been taken account of but the demand uncertainty is probably the most critical and essential element of the Norwegian High Speed Rail project and is close related to a second variable; the passengers’ willingness to pay for high-speed rail.\nThe topics for this master thesis is of theoretical character and has no ambition to quantify the level of financial needs for construction costs and operating costs of the High Speed Rail project.\nProducing a cost-benefit analysis (which is a list of quantified benefits and costs associated with the project, expressed in monetary values, calculated ex ante), with a valid conclusion turned out to be far out of reach for this thesis. The evolvement of the thesis has been a process with changing criteria for commenting selected High Speed Rail projects. An example is the decision (January 2012) to build the HS2 project in England.5\nSome empirical cases from High Speed Rail projects bring interesting challenges to the surface. Even when the number of passenger in other countries with High Speed Rail are many times the number of passengers between regions around Norwegian urban areas, High Speed Rail projects will very seldom pay off. There will not be any conclusion in this thesis about which scenario to choose.\nThe number of passenger for each of the High Speed Rail projects in this thesis is too complicated to quantify. Aspirations for this thesis are therefore to focus on some of the challenges in these kinds of mega projects.\nThe conclusion is that timing of the construction and implementing of the High Speed Rail project is crucial for the result of the cost benefit analysis whether the Norwegian High Speed Rail project should be built or not. Timing influences all the variables of the cost benefit analysis in this thesis. Timing is therefore crucial for the result of the analyses. It’s beyond the limit of this thesis to conclude whether the increasing demand for transport caused by population growth in the regions around cities in Norway should be solved by building the High Speed Rail project or not.\nIt seems as the Norwegian High Speed Rail project is many decades too early for an efficient use of resources.

Key concepts: Transport engineering, Engineering, Third rail, Rail traffic, Automotive engineering, Environmental science, Civil engineering, Mechanical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
High speed rail : challenges for the high speed rail project in Norway — Research Paper | ScholarLens