1991PubMedRequires access

[Research on karyotypic consistency between chorionic villi and fetus].

G Liu, Chang‐Xi Yu

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

In the last decade, chorionic villi sampling (CVS) has been widely accepted as a new technique in prenatal diagnosis. An inconsistency in karyotypes between CVS and fetal tissue was found in clinical practice, although the chorionic villi and the fetal tissues were from the same fertilized ovum. Karyotypes from direct chromosomal preparation of chorionic villi and cultured fetal tissues in 52 artificial abortion samples were compared. Results showed two cases with karyotypic inconsistency: (1) 46, XX/46, XY in the chorionic villus direct preparation and 46, XX in the fetal tissue; (2) 46, XY in the direct preparation of chorionic villi and 45,XY, t (15q21q) de novo in the fetal tissue. Our research demonstrates that karyotype from chorionic villus direct preparation does not always reflect the fetal karyotype.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the last decade, chorionic villi sampling (CVS) has been widely accepted as a new technique in prenatal diagnosis. An inconsistency in karyotypes between CVS and fetal tissue was found in clinical practice, although the chorionic villi and the fetal tissues were from the same fertilized ovum. Karyotypes from direct chromosomal preparation of chorionic villi and cultured fetal tissues in 52 artificial abortion samples were compared. Results showed two cases with karyotypic inconsistency: (1) 46, XX/46, XY in the chorionic villus direct preparation and 46, XX in the fetal tissue; (2) 46, XY in the direct preparation of chorionic villi and 45,XY, t (15q21q) de novo in the fetal tissue. Our research demonstrates that karyotype from chorionic villus direct preparation does not always reflect the fetal karyotype.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the last decade, chorionic villi sampling (CVS) has been widely accepted as a new technique in prenatal diagnosis. An inconsistency in karyotypes between CVS and fetal tissue was found in clinical practice, although the chorionic villi and the fetal tissues were from the same fertilized ovum. Karyotypes from direct chromosomal preparation of chorionic villi and cultured fetal tissues in 52 artificial abortion samples were compared. Results showed two cases with karyotypic inconsistency: (1) 46, XX/46, XY in the chorionic villus direct preparation and 46, XX in the fetal tissue; (2) 46, XY in the direct preparation of chorionic villi and 45,XY, t (15q21q) de novo in the fetal tissue. Our research demonstrates that karyotype from chorionic villus direct preparation does not always reflect the fetal karyotype.

Key concepts: Chorionic villi, Chorionic villus sampling, Karyotype, Fetus, Biology, Andrology, Prenatal diagnosis, Gynecology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Research on karyotypic consistency between chorionic villi and fetus]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens